Jump to content

GOP debate crunchtime: 'The time for lowering expectations is over'


Geee

Recommended Posts

WestVirginiaRebel

Ben Carson shows why he's not a politician-he's willing to admit when he was wrongbiggrin.png

 

Huckabee talks about the blimp as an example of governmentlaugh.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

righteousmomma

Too bad so many are watching baseball. Best feel yet for all the candidates. VERY sorry to say that Dr. Carson has come off the weakest in his answers. He is just not a glib speaker and does not sound confident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WestVirginiaRebel

Too bad so many are watching baseball. Best feel yet for all the candidates. VERY sorry to say that Dr. Carson has come off the weakest in his answers. He is just not a glib speaker and does not sound confident.

Debates been berry berry good to me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WestVirginiaRebel

Chris Christie is right about fantasy football-who cares???

 

Winners:

 

Rubio on specifics. Cruz 2nd. Huckabee a strong 3rd. The moderators tried to trip up all of the candidates and failed miserably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Questions seem pretty biased for big government.

 

Most of the conservatives from CNBC left and are now working at Fox Business. I do recognize a couple that are still there. Rick, the guy that was asking the questions about the fed. - he works at the Chicago Board of Trade and threw a fit when being questioned about the government bail out in the beginning of the Obama administration. He said that the people should rise up just as they did at the beginning when they threw the tea in the harbor. His remarks hit social media and Youtube everywhere. Thus was the beginning of -----The Tea Party!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't pick a winner tonight. I don't think Jeb did himself any favors. Trump was Trump. I thought Christie might have risen a bit. Like Rubio said, the Republican Party has a group of excellent people running for president. Or did Huckabee say that? Anyway, they shine compared to the tired Dems.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the biggest losers here were the people having to watch these "moderators" from CNBC. The 2nd biggest loser was probably Bush. He really needed to do something and he only got 6 minutes of time versus 11/12 for the top "guys". He is running out of time.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad so many are watching baseball. Best feel yet for all the candidates. VERY sorry to say that Dr. Carson has come off the weakest in his answers. He is just not a glib speaker and does not sound confident.

 

 

There will be plenty of vids by the morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the biggest losers here were the people having to watch these "moderators" from CNBC. The 2nd biggest loser was probably Bush. He really needed to do something and he only got 6 minutes of time versus 11/12 for the top "guys". He is running out of time.

 

 

Why can't there be a "Debate" either without moderators (the candidates just talking to each other, or conservatives asking the questions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think the biggest losers here were the people having to watch these "moderators" from CNBC. The 2nd biggest loser was probably Bush. He really needed to do something and he only got 6 minutes of time versus 11/12 for the top "guys". He is running out of time.

 

Why can't there be a "Debate" either without moderators (the candidates just talking to each other, or conservatives asking the questions?

 

 

 

Questions for the RNC

Scott Johnson

October 28, 2015

 

Watching the Republican candidates debate on CNBC, I see a glorified disgrace. The leading Republican candidates are an impressive crew. We are charged with the responsibility of choosing who among them can best represent us in the coming presidential election. Yet the RNC has set up a program of debates that has served up a prominent forum for smash face attacks on our leading candidates by moderators who sound like Democratic operatives — groin kicking Democratic operatives.

 

I have a few questions for the chairman of the RNC and his colleagues. Who among you thought it would be a good idea to authorize a panel of CNBC moderators to smash up the leading candidates for the Republican presidential nomination? Will you please identify yourselves for the record and explain your thinking? In retrospect, do you think it was a good idea? If not, will you explain why you let it happen? Will you do the decent thing and resign your position of leadership in the Republican Party?

 

UPDATE: RNC Chairman Priebus disapproved of CNBC’s performance. I guess we are to infer that he is just an innocent bystander.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg5O1kdRh5o

 

 

 

I think the biggest losers here were the people having to watch these "moderators" from CNBC. The 2nd biggest loser was probably Bush. He really needed to do something and he only got 6 minutes of time versus 11/12 for the top "guys". He is running out of time.



Why can't there be a "Debate" either without moderators (the candidates just talking to each other, or conservatives asking the questions?

 



Questions for the RNC
Scott Johnson
October 28, 2015

Watching the Republican candidates debate on CNBC, I see a glorified disgrace. The leading Republican candidates are an impressive crew. We are charged with the responsibility of choosing who among them can best represent us in the coming presidential election. Yet the RNC has set up a program of debates that has served up a prominent forum for smash face attacks on our leading candidates by moderators who sound like Democratic operatives — groin kicking Democratic operatives.

 

I have a few questions for the chairman of the RNC and his colleagues. Who among you thought it would be a good idea to authorize a panel of CNBC moderators to smash up the leading candidates for the Republican presidential nomination? Will you please identify yourselves for the record and explain your thinking? In retrospect, do you think it was a good idea? If not, will you explain why you let it happen? Will you do the decent thing and resign your position of leadership in the Republican Party?

 

UPDATE: RNC Chairman Priebus disapproved of CNBC’s performance. I guess we are to infer that he is just an innocent bystander.

 

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQqzHv0-ZDY

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1715858696
×
×
  • Create New...