Jump to content

FBI Director James Comey to Face Congress over Clinton Email Investigation

Valin

By Valin
in News & Opinion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Draggingtree

Draggingtree

Posted
Posted

In a Sane World, This Would Be Disqualifying

n a normal world, what the FBI discovered about Clinton’s emails would disqualify her from office. But these are not normal times. The FBI Director laid out an impressive case against Mrs. Clinton, but will not recommend an indictment. One must wonder if it is because James Comey wants to stop Donald Trump or has visions of Vince Foster dancing in his head. One must also remember that this is the same FBI that interviewed the Orlando terrorist,

 

Omar Mateen, twice and decided he was harmless.

Scissors-32x32.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nickydog

nickydog

Posted
Posted

 

 

@nickydog

 

Or You Could Say He Did What He Could, Given The Situation.

 

The Situation?

 

 

The Political Situation..the AG, POTUS were not (IMO) going to try very hard to 1. get an indictment 2. If they did get an indictment prosecute the case to the best of their ability.

 

So he may have been thinking "OK, I'm going to at least get this out in the public, and make it hard for the democrats to hide or spin this, and I'll take the flack for doing this."

 

Right now this is the only thing that makes any sense to me.

 

 

That makes sense to me, too. Which makes him a hero of sorts, not a coward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SrWoodchuck

SrWoodchuck

Posted
Posted

 

@nickydog

 

Or You Could Say He Did What He Could, Given The Situation.

 

The Situation?

 

 

The Founders pledged their Lives, their Fortunes & their Sacred Honor. Nowadays that's way too much for any high federal functionary.

 

Witness: John Roberts & now, Comey...or any mid-to-top level judge, inspector general or bureaucratic official of an "Alphabet" Department.

 

Barky's "Chicago rules" probably include blackmail & threats of harm to family.

 

Maybe they'd be willing to pledge their aggravation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Draggingtree

Draggingtree

Posted
Posted
shutterstock_296708867-e1467985259539.jpThere is only one answer to the events that are unfolding around us: Speak the truth. It’s not hard to find. Even the Washington Post sort of stumbled over it. Key quote:

In a year-long study, The Washington Post found that the kind of incidents that have ignited protests in many U.S. communities — most often, white police officers killing unarmed black men — represent less than 4 percent of fatal police shootings. Meanwhile, The Post found that the great majority of people who died at the hands of the police fit at least one of three categories: they were wielding weapons, they were suicidal or mentally troubled, or they ran when officers told them to halt.
Scissors-32x32.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Valin

Valin

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

 

@nickydog

 

Or You Could Say He Did What He Could, Given The Situation.

 

The Situation?

 

 

The Founders pledged their Lives, their Fortunes & their Sacred Honor. Nowadays that's way too much for any high federal functionary.

 

Witness: John Roberts & now, Comey...or any mid-to-top level judge, inspector general or bureaucratic official of an "Alphabet" Department.

 

Barky's "Chicago rules" probably include blackmail & threats of harm to family.

 

Maybe they'd be willing to pledge their aggravation?

 

 

1. 1776 and 2016 2 different times and situations.

2. blackmail...etc? Don't think so. No need.

3. I believe he did what he could do, to make sure this was not buried or spun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • 1715931134
×
×
  • Create New...