mozartlover Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 This is actually the top story on Google News at the moment. I've been checking for a couple of days and never saw anything, until now. (WaPo article) http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/house-committee-holds-hearing-on-benghazi-attacks/2013/05/08/639da672-b7ea-11e2-b94c-b684dda07add_story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozartlover Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Wish I could have watched all of it; only saw the last 10 minutes. Hope they play it again; I want to see Trey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted May 8, 2013 Author Share Posted May 8, 2013 Daily Kos: Best laid plans of Issa and Fox News thwarted by breaking news Poor Darrell Issa. He probably thought this was going to be his day. Wall-to-wall coverage of his hearing with the Benghazi whistle-blowers on cable news. The lead story on the national news broadcasts. Fox News was probably looking forward to putting things into the worst possible light for the Obama administration, with live coverage of the hearings and then "analysis" on their opinion shows (The Five, O'Reilly, Hannity). The public would be so outraged and there would be so much damage to the administration that both Obama and Biden would have to resign to avoid impeachment, and Hillary Clinton would be permanently damaged for 2016. Too bad for them that very few people will remember what was said in the hearing today as the other news of the day will suck all the oxygen out of the media coverage. It began on Monday with the rescue of the three women who had been kidnapped in Cleveland. More lurid details were bound to come out (like reports of a naked woman seen in the backyard) which would interest the public more than the Congressional testimony. Then, this morning, right in the middle of the hearings, two of the victims went home. CNN and MSNBC went with live coverage of that, and even Fox broke away to cover the return of Gina Dejesus. And after that, it was announced that there was a verdict in the Jody Arias case. That as opposed to Benghazi was the lead story on both Shepard Smith's and Neil Cavuto's programs. As I write this, none of the Fox opinion shows have aired, so I don't know where they're going to go. But I think Sean Hannity is going to have difficulty getting traction on Benghazi on a day like today. (Snip) I guess that settles that. Darn it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Good discussion....sorry I missed it.... Fourth Benghazi witness gagged by red tape http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/08/fourth-benghazi-witness-gagged-by-red-tape/ Obama administration officials are finally letting the attorney for a Benghazi whistle-blower get a security clearance — but the clearance is at such a low level that it will probably slow the congressional probe of how the administration handled last year’s terrorist attack on the embassy in Benghazi, Libya. Victoria Toensing represents an unnamed government official who can help explain the reaction of top government officials to the jihadi attack on the U.S diplomatic site in Benghazi and killed four Americans last Sept. 11. The official may also be able to explain if officials rewrote intelligence reports and took other actions to minimize media coverage of the administration’s errors and the perceived role of Al Qaeda jihadis. DailyCaller via WeaselZippers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 @SrWoodchuck In honor of the stylistic and non substantive approach of the White House, I am changing my signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 @SrWoodchuck In honor of the stylistic and non substantive approach of the White House, I am changing my signature. Well played, Dr.@Pepper! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Clinton’s Republican Guard http://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2013/05/07/clintons-republican-guard/ With each new revelation, what has always been obvious becomes more pronounced: the State Department’s self-proclaimed final word on the Benghazi Massacre, the risibly named “Accountability Review Board” investigation, is a fraud. Yet, like the rest of the Obama administration’s obstructive wagon-circling, the ARB’s report continues serving its intended purpose: to thwart efforts to hold administration officials accountable. Even on Fox News, which has been admirably dogged covering a scandal the Obamedia has done its best to bury, the refrain is heard: How could the ARB report be a whitewash when its investigation was run by such Washington eminences as Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Admiral Michael Mullen? The answer is simple: Pickering and Mullen were not chosen by accident; then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tapped them because, to insulate herself, she needed a pair of Beltway careerists held in high esteem by the progressive-friendly Republican establishment. As night follows day, Pickering and Mullen produced exactly the shoddy, politicized report that was expected of them – bleaching away the malfeasance of Clinton, a central figure in the scandal whom they did not even bother to interview. Mrs. Clinton is a master of this game. Recall that her top advisor at State was Huma Abedin, a longtime associate of Omar Abdullah Naseef, a rabid Islamic supremacist and financial backer of al Qaeda. For a dozen years, during most of which she was also working for Mrs. Clinton, Abedin worked at Naseef’s Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs – a building block of the joint Saudi regime and Muslim Brotherhood project to promote sharia enclaves in the West, encouraging Muslims to resist assimilation. Abedin had begun working for then-First Lady Hillary Clinton in the nineties, while a member of the executive board of the Muslim Students Association (MSA) at George Washington University. Founded in the early sixties, the MSA is first building block of the Brotherhood’s American infrastructure, and its GWU chapter has quite a history: In 2001, its “spriritual guide” was Anwar al-Awlaki, the al-Qaeda operative who was then ministering to some of the eventual 9/11 suicide-hijackers. As Patrick Poole has demonstrated, it was in the MSA that Awlaki first cut his Islamic supremacist teeth – as have a number of prominent Islamists, including (to name just two) Mohamed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood stalwart turned Egyptian president, and Abdurrahman Alamoudi, a now convicted al Qaeda financier who was a favorite “moderate” Muslim leader of the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. Abedin continued at Naseef’s journal until moving to the State Department with Secretary Clinton in 2009. Naseef, a wealthy, well-connected Saudi, was secretary general of the Muslim World League, perhaps the most significant Saudi-Brotherhood collaboration in the world. Great post, with background on Pickering & Mullen & their ineptness........ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
righteousmomma Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Sr woodchuck, re the State Dept. article from pj media -- occurred to me - remember back in Bush and Rumsfeld's day how much trouble they had with the State Department? Suppose to be mostly filled with liberals and progressives (Democrats). One reason of several that Colin Powell was so liked there. Anyway does not look like much has changed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted May 9, 2013 Author Share Posted May 9, 2013 4 minutes 30 seconds before a question is asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted May 9, 2013 Author Share Posted May 9, 2013 (edited) UpdateBenghazi – what’s new?8:01 am on May 9, 2013 by Ed MorrisseyNot much, if you listen to apologists for the White House and State Department, even after the testimony of two previously-excluded whistleblowers yesterday at a House Oversight Committee hearing on the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans. Glenn Kessler, the Washington Post fact-checker, says that while some of what was said has already come out — somewhat reluctantly — there were in fact some new revelations. And even what we know think as established fact has new angles that carry some big implications.For instance, let’s look at the demonstration run amok vs terrorist attack narrative issue. Kessler points out that we have known for months that there was no demonstration at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack. Earlier reports said that confusion may have come from a lack of information combined with demonstrations in other countries in the region. What’s new, Kessler points out, is Hicks’ testimony that he spoke directly with Hillary Clinton on the night of the attack and briefed her:(Snip) Edited May 9, 2013 by Valin Update Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickydog Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 So are the hearings over now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted May 9, 2013 Author Share Posted May 9, 2013 So are the hearings over now? For now. There will be more. (putting on my analysis cap) This is just to good of an issue for the Republicans/Conservatives to let go of. I just want to know what the hell happened! I would also like to know just who was the genius who came up with It Was A Movie idea. Smooooth real smooth! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted May 9, 2013 Author Share Posted May 9, 2013 Deep Thoughts From Elijah Cummings Like Wow Man, like that's soooo heavy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickydog Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Deep Thoughts From Elijah Cummings Like Wow Man, like that's soooo heavy. At least he knows how to pronounce "corps." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted May 9, 2013 Author Share Posted May 9, 2013 At least he knows how to pronounce "corps." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geee Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Testimony: Stevens Went to Benghazi Mission on 9/11/12 So Clinton Could Announce on Upcoming Libyan Visit It Had Become Permanent U.S. Post (CNSNews.com) -- Amb. Chris Stevens--murdered by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya on the eleventh anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks—was at the poorly secured State Department facility in that city that day at least in part because Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wanted to convert the department compound there into a permanent outpost and department officials wanted her to be able to announce this was the case when she made a planned visit to Libya in December 2012. Stevens’ top deputy in Libya, Greg Hicks, made this point in congressional testimony on Wednesday, but it was omitted from the State Department's Accountability Review Board report published in December. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/testimony-stevens-went-benghazi-mission-91112-so-clinton-could-announce-upcoming-libyan 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draggingtree Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Not talking points and talking it up that matter, but finding justice for four courageous Americans left to die horrific deaths by a government that lives by its lies Where is Justice for Benghazi? By Judi McLeod (Bio and Archives) Thursday, May 9, 2013 If the Benghazi investigations before the House Oversight and Reform Committee prove anything it’s that we all live in a world dominated by talking points as victims of a world dominated by government and media lies. It was “talking points” that gave oxygen to the Big Lie that an unwatched anti-Islamic YouTube was responsible for the terrorist attack in Benghazi which took the lives of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. When former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton yelled “What difference does it make”, she knew at heart that the Obama regime was already making sure Benghazi wouldn’t matter. We bridled at her hissy fit, http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/55082 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draggingtree Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Is Ben Rhodes the Mastermind Behind the Benghazi Cover Up? Posted on May 8, 2013 by Tim Brown I wrote yesterday about how the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) knew that the attack in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 was a terrorist attack by Al-Qaeda operatives. We know the Obama White House put out the story for nearly a week that it was just Muslims upset over a benign YouTube video. In spite of knowing what was going on and having the ability to intervene, the Obama administration did nothing to stop or assist Americans who they knew were being attacked by Al-Qaeda. Instead, they chose to cover it up and intimidate witnesses. Stephen F. Hayes has an excellent piece at the Weekly Standard titled The Benghazi Talking Points, in which he fingers the man he believes is the main person behind the Benghazi cover up, Ben Rhodes. Continue reading → snip http://dcclothesline...r-up/#more-7034 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draggingtree Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 Analysis: Obama's Benghazi Propagandist FrontPageMag.com A young White House speechwriter may be responsible for concocting the official lies about last September's deadly terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya. The Obama administration's rapidly unraveling narrative about what happened at the US consulate in Libya's second-largest city may have been cooked up by creative writer Ben Rhodes, the president's 30-something Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications and Speechwriting. The origin of the administration's desperate election-season fabrications may come up today as a congressional committee hears from three government whistleblowers who are expected to contradict the administration's version of the events of Sept. 11, 2012. There is little doubt now that the Obama White House twisted the facts for partisan political advantage. Stephen F. Hayes of the Weekly Standard reports that the CIA's talking points about what happened in Benghazi were manipulated by senior Obama administration officials as they "knowingly misled the country" in the days following the attacks http://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/9274 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollyannaish Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 I have never hear anything so silent in the media in my life. Wow. Only thing I can think is that they knew. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
righteousmomma Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 of course some of them knew but its how they heard and perceived what they knew. They will do anything and ignore anything and anyone to shield the president and the future president. Ignorance (without knowledge) is bliss tp some.Now thw blame game is beginning. The first to be thrown under the bus and run over is the "young speech writer " Translation: he was young and inexperienced and with all the other many responsibilities the pres has etc the poor caring worn out pres was misled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted May 9, 2013 Share Posted May 9, 2013 While the hearings were taking place, guess where Hillary was? Hillary Clinton Accepts Public Service Award In Beverly Hills Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrived at a Beverly Hills gala to much fanfare on Wednesday as she prepared to accept an award for her public service. Local volunteers from a national organization called “Ready for Hillary 2016″ were organized outside the Beverly Wilshire hotel, where the Pacific Council on International Policy would be honoring the secretary. The Council awarded Clinton with the inaugural Warren Christopher Public Service Award, named after the former secretary of state who served under her husband, former President Bill Clinton, from 1993 to 1996. snip The award in his name honors “the public service of others whose work reflects his distinctive leadership qualities,” according to the Pacific Council, which considers itself “the premier international affairs organization focused on policy issues of special resonance to the West Coast”, according to its website. snip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted May 9, 2013 Author Share Posted May 9, 2013 Analysis: Obama's Benghazi Propagandist FrontPageMag.com A young White House speechwriter may be responsible for concocting the official lies about last September's deadly terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya. The Obama administration's rapidly unraveling narrative about what happened at the US consulate in Libya's second-largest city may have been cooked up by creative writer Ben Rhodes, the president's 30-something Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications and Speechwriting. The origin of the administration's desperate election-season fabrications may come up today as a congressional committee hears from three government whistleblowers who are expected to contradict the administration's version of the events of Sept. 11, 2012. There is little doubt now that the Obama White House twisted the facts for partisan political advantage. Stephen F. Hayes of the Weekly Standard reports that the CIA's talking points about what happened in Benghazi were manipulated by senior Obama administration officials as they "knowingly misled the country" in the days following the attacks http://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/9274 So Ben Rhodes is the one who came up with The Movie Meme? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted May 9, 2013 Author Share Posted May 9, 2013 While the hearings were taking place, guess where Hillary was? Warren Christopher Public Service Award. A quick check of Wiki.... Oslo Accords, September 1993 Rwandan Genocide, April 1994 China: Delinking human rights and trade status, May 1994 Dayton Agreement, November 1995 Khobar Towers bombing, June 1996 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now