Jump to content

Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control


Draggingtree

Recommended Posts

Draggingtree

cnsnews.comCNS News:

 

 

 

Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control, Student Tells Pelosi Hearing Touting Freebie Mandate

 

By Craig Bannister

 

February 27, 2012

 

Subscribe to Craig Bannister's posts

 

 

A Georgetown co-ed told Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s hearing that the women in her law school program are having so much sex that they’re going broke, so you and I should pay for their birth control.

 

Speaking at a hearing held by Pelosi to tout Pres. Obama’s mandate that virtually every health insurance plan cover the full cost of contraception and abortion-inducing products, Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke said that it’s too expensive to have sex in law school without mandated insurance coverage.

 

Apparently, four out of every ten co-eds are having so much sex that it's hard to make ends meet if they have to pay for their own contraception, Fluke's research shows.

 

"Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy (Georgetown student insurance not covering contraception), Fluke reported.

 

It costs a female student $3,000 to have protected sex over the course of her three-year stint in law school, according to her calculations.

 

"Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school," Fluke told the hearing.

 

$3,000 for birth control in three years? That’s a thousand dollars a year of sex – and, she wants us to pay for it.

 

Yes, us. Where do you think the insurance companies forced to cover this cost get the money to pay for these co-eds to have sex? It comes from the health care insurance premiums you and I pay.

 

But, back to this woman’s complaint that she’s spending $3,000 for birth control during her time in college.Scissors-32x32.png

Read more

http://cnsnews.com/

 

CNS News

 


Link to comment
Share on other sites

So she wants us, the taxpayer to pay for her sex... So the taxpayer gets screwed without the fringe benefit....

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rush just put it this way...

 

There is a group of women who want someone to pay for their sex.... What does that make them?

 

LMFAO.gif

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rush just put it this way...

 

There is a group of women who want someone to pay for their sex.... What does that make them?

 

LMFAO.gif

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsqS6B3dICA

 

I wonder if they understand how much fun Rush is having with this?

 

I also wonder who thought it was a good idea to have Ms Fluke get up in front of the nation and admit shes Easy Alice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

righteousmomma

Rush was having fun.

 

FLUKE: When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected by this lack of contraceptive coverage.

RUSH: Can you believe this?

 

T

RUSH: You know, folks, millions of women enjoy sex in the back of a car. You have some women that can't afford a car. What are we to do? What is our solution to women who prefer sex in the backseat of a car but can't afford a car? I've run some numbers here. Did you notice in that sound bite Sheila Jackson Lee or Maria Cantwell or one of them talked about the strength that Sandra Fluke had to go before Congress, which is amazing. She's having so much sex it's amazing she can still walk, but she made it up there. It takes a lot of courage to ask for something free, folks. Takes a lot of strength to ask for freebies, doesn't it? I'm being facetious. You know what the solution is here, why doesn't Georgetown lower their tuition?

Here the numbers at Georgetown right now. Georgetown law costs $45,000 per year, $20,000 for room and board, sex not included. So tuition and room and board is 60 grand a year and this woman's up at Congress asking for thousands of dollars in birth control pills. This college, this law school, they need to establish a new scholarship, the Wilt Chamberlain Scholarship, exclusively for women.

Rocky in Jacksonville, Florida, great to have you on the EIB Network. Hello.

CALLER: Hi, Rush. I think they ought to add the cost of the birth control to their student loan and then they can be responsible and pay it off.

RUSH: I agree. This is a matter of personal choice. It's an elective activity, or is it? Maybe they're sex addicts. I mean this is the kind of stuff, we're talking sex addict frequency here. But that's a good point, why us? See, that's why this is so instructive, folks. For all the hilarity here, and there's plenty of it, the microcosm contained in this entire episode tells us everything about who we're up against. This whole thing is a manufactured, fake issue. Nobody is denying anybody contraception. Nobody. No Republican was ever suggesting that contraception be banned. It never happened. It wasn't being discussed by the Republicans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rush was having fun.

 

FLUKE: When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected by this lack of contraceptive coverage

 

Where were these women when i was a kid!

 

I could make a comment about women lawyers getting screwed...but that would be wrong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Casino67

It could be a box of condoms, but the Left does not have a sense of humor.

 

Oh sure they do...when it comes to dishing it out. Taking it? that's a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how many attorneys are lined up in front of Fluke's dorm wanting to represent her against the 'slut' remark? I would think they would be concerned about proving it isn't a true description. I bet her parents are proud of her. I also heard that she is/was to be on Ed Shultz's show tonight, guess she is showing her true colors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stunner. Georgetown “Coed” Sandra Fluke Is a 30 Year-Old Women’s Rights Activist

 

Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, March 2, 2012, 1:23 PM

 

What a shock! It was all a BIG PRODUCTION!

 

The Democrat’s token abused college coed is actually a 30 year-old hardcore women’s rights activist.

 

Sandra Fluke is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.

Jammie Wearing Fool reported:

I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed.

 

Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.

 

In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stunner. Georgetown “Coed” Sandra Fluke Is a 30 Year-Old Women’s Rights Activist

 

Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, March 2, 2012, 1:23 PM

 

What a shock! It was all a BIG PRODUCTION!

 

The Democrat’s token abused college coed is actually a 30 year-old hardcore women’s rights activist.

 

Sandra Fluke is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.

Jammie Wearing Fool reported:

I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed.

 

Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.

 

In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.

 

 

ohmy.png

 

 

 

rolleyes.gif

 

Not that this will make any difference what so ever to certain people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ms. Fluck took the president's call to her while she was in Chris Matthews' office.

 

Just your typical student. No bias, no agenda, just the facts. LOL.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

Does this make her a MILF? {Middle-aged Intellectual Liberal Falsie}

 

Sandra is seriously "Fluked Up!"

 

Glad to see that Oblunder could add his two cents before she was exposed. If he now had a beer summit with Rush & Sandy....do we have to supply the contraceptives?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When did it become a right that companies had to provide health care coverage at all? Serious question...I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this make her a MILF? {Middle-aged Intellectual Liberal Falsie}

 

Sandra is seriously "Fluked Up!"

 

Glad to see that Oblunder could add his two cents before she was exposed. If he now had a beer summit with Rush & Sandy....do we have to supply the contraceptives?

And buy the beer and throw in the two cents.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of vitriol against Rush from the obvious and regular parties. Does anyone think Rush is worried about the few sponsors bailing? those sponsors will lose more money from the conservatives who buy their products than they would have ever gained from those having a hissy fit. Rush has so many options and so much financial security at this point it is moot.

 

The young lady (???) in question is getting what she wanted. The attention and kudos from the lib factions for which she is an activist & spokesman. How stupid to think the other side would not react & not do a little digging. Wonder if she is prepared for the real onslaught that hasn't even begun?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Draggingtree

Doug Ross @ Journal

 

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/

 

 

Got Slut? The Left Launches a Coordinated Attack Against Rush Limbaugh

 

 

If a ringer goes in front of Congress and demands that I pay for her birth control, then obviously she must suffer from nymphomania. Because contraceptives don't cost a heck of a lot of money. And, if she's truly needy, there's -- what -- a Planned Parenthood in every neighborhood?

 

I mean, she wants free contraceptives, but what about cancer patients? Should we be subsidizing Sandra Fluke's sex life? Or should we be spending that money on cancer research or other real women's health issues?

 

• Someone named "Sandra Fluke" -- if that is her real name -- testified in front of Congress in support of a "contraception mandate". That is, she publicly demanded free contraceptives as a matter of "women's health" and was treated to a liberal media smucker-fest.

 

• Well, it turns out Fluke, positioned by the media as a 23-year old law student, is actually a 30-year old "reproductive rights advocate".

 

Limbaugh, like any right-thinking American, was offended:

 

What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We're the pimps.Scissors-32x32.png

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hypocrisy of the left and the mainstream media, the selective outrage is outrageous. Now a few knee jerk advertisers are bailing on on Rush. Who shopped at Autozone anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1714605236
×
×
  • Create New...