WestVirginiaRebel Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 Daily Caller: A left-wing charity organization with unknown sources of money is providing the funding for protests around the country — some of which have turned into violent riots — that have threatened a divided nation’s ability to unify after a contentious presidential election. he Progress Unity Fund is a tax-exempt 501©3 organization — the same classification as the Red Cross. The group’s mission is to “provide a progressive alternative to mainstream charities,” according to its IRS filings. The fund provides the financial backing for Act Now To Stop War & End Racism (ANSWER) Coalition, a left-wing activist group that began organizing “emergency protests” immediately after Trump’s election. Cities where ANSWER held protests included: Chicago, New York, DC and San Francisco, among others. ________ Rioting for charity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyM Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 The one person that could put an end to the childish protests is..... Hillary Clinton. She could make appeals across multiple venues and I think the babies would listen to her if it was properly presented. But.... 《crickets》 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted November 12, 2016 Share Posted November 12, 2016 The Progress Unity Fund 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 It pays well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draggingtree Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 An argument in favor of anti-Trump rioting By DrJohn 9 Comments Sat, Nov, 12th, 2016740 views For the third night in a row, the imbecilic anti-democracy, anti-American anti-Trump riots continue. The rioters consist principally of young stupid snowflake anarchists completely removed from real life. Cities across the country continue to suffer: Portland In the Portland incident, police said in a statement that a man got out of a vehicle on the… Read more » Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draggingtree Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 November 13, 2016 About those rioters... By Patricia McCarthy For many months, the LeftMedia have been warning that Trump supporters were so clearly violent they would likely riot when he lost the election. The media were salivating at the ratings triumph of this imagined scenario. They knew that it was coming, and it was going to validate their contempt for Trump and anyone who supported him. So prevalent was the conviction that Trump was going to lose, and lose badly, that Chris Wallace, in the last debate, asked Trump if he would concede if he lost. It never occurred to him to ask Clinton the same question. Of course it didn't. The media have been of one mind this past year and a half, including Fox News; Clinton was a shoe-in. The Donald did not have a chance. Not only would Clinton win, but the Senate and maybe even the House would fall back into Democrat hands. Chuck Schumer was measuring for drapes in the speaker's office. This is how thoroughly resistant to the national temperament all of the news media has been throughout this campaign. They are deaf and blind to the reality of so many American citizens' fury at the political elite so perfectly exemplified by Hillary Clinton and her adherents. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/about_those_rioters.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Comey’s FBI Needs to Investigate Violent Democratic TantrumsRobert Creamer-type operations—like coordinated nation-wide protests—require moneyAustin Bay12/02/16 It’s time for the FBI to conduct a detailed investigation into the violence and political thuggery that continue to mar the presidential election’s aftermath. A thorough probe of the protests—to include possible ties to organizations demanding vote recounts—will give the Bureau’s integrity-challenged director, James Comey, a chance to sandblast his sullied badge. Director Comey must also include “elector intimidation” on his post-election investigation list. Reports that members of the Electoral College are being harassed and threatened by angry, vicious (and likely Democratic Party) malcontents require Comey’s quick and systematic attention. Michael Banerian, one of Michigan’s 16 electors, told CNN: “Obviously, this election cycle was pretty divisive. Unfortunately it’s bled over into the weeks following the election and I have been inundated with death threats, death wishes, generally angry messages trying to get me to change my vote to Hillary Clinton or another person, and unfortunately, it’s gotten a little out of control.” A little out of control? What an understatement. Let me put it to you straight and personal, Jim. Identifying electors and then attempting to intimidate them into switching their votes is an ipso facto effort to overturn a national election. Which leads to a question a competent FBI Director would already have his agents asking: Is this elector threat scheme a coordinated operation? (Snip) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now