Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

[Valin]

Project Veritas Action:

[/b]LANGUAGE WARNING[/b]

 

[Valin]

 

 

[Valin]

O’Keefe: ‘Why the hell isn’t the press covering this?’
posted at 8:31 am on October 19, 2016 by Larry O'Connor

If a Trump SuperPAC was exposed inciting violence at Hillary rallies, do you think the media would cover it? The question answers itself, doesn’t it?

 

Yet the latest bombshell videos from James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas have been reduced to “kid on a milk carton” status by network news outlets and most of the cable news networks.

 

Yesterday on WMAL in Washington DC I interviewed O’Keefe about the videos and the apparent MSM blackout:

 

(Snip)

 

____________________________________________________________________________________

 

Audio at Hot Air Link

[Valin]

Spin...Snip...Spin....Spin

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1ThWN9XHaM

[Valin]

[Geee]

Dem Operative Who Oversaw Trump Rally Agitators Visited White House 342 Times

 

A key operative in a Democratic scheme to send agitators to cause unrest at Donald Trump’s rallies has visited the White House 342 times since 2009, White House records show.

 

Robert Creamer, who acted as a middle man between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee and “protesters” who tried — and succeeded — to provoke violence at Trump rallies met with President Obama 47 times, according to White House records. Creamer’s last visit was in June 2016.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/

[Geee]

Rigged Election? Past Presidential Contests Sowed Doubt and Nearly Led to Violence

 

In the 2016 presidential election, one candidate is warning about voter fraud, while another proclaims Russians are interfering. It’s not the first time contenders have alleged some form of a “rigged” election.

 

Tuesday in the Rose Garden, President Barack Obama dismissed concerns of fraud.

 

“I have never seen in my lifetime, or in modern political history, any presidential candidate trying to discredit the elections process before votes have even taken place. It’s unprecedented,” Obama said.

 

“There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections, in part because they are so decentralized and the number of votes that are cast,” the president added. “There is no evidence that has happened in the past, or instances that will happen this year.”

 

While such complaints have been rare before votes were cast, they were very prominent in certain presidential elections, as was evidence that votes weren’t always counted properly.

 

http://dailysignal.com/2016/10/18/rigged-election-past-presidential-contests-sowed-doubt-and-nearly-led-to-violence/

[Draggingtree]

[Valin]

Donna Brazile CANNOT take Megyn Kelly — And It’s Hilariously Uncomfortable (VIDEO)

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVnkPuWvjLg

[Valin]

Trump rally video from CNN PROVES Wikileaks and O’Keefe video TRUE!!

A lot of people are wondering how much stock we should put into the Wikileaks emails since it’s most likely a Russian espionage operation. Probably some of the emails are faked, but the Dems are too scared out of their minds to admit which ones are real, so they’re leaving them all out there, unanswered.

Here’s at least one narrative that appears to be confirmed by simply looking at CNN video from a Trump rally.

A Twitter sleuth put a video together to explain how it works:

 

(Snip)

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Short Vid At Link

[Valin]

Videos Put Democrats on Defensive About Dirty Tricks
STEVE EDER and JONATHAN MARTIN
OCT. 20, 2016

A Democratic operative, wearing a checkered blue shirt and a tie, spoke calmly, explaining exactly how agents could infiltrate the rallies of Donald J. Trump and cause mayhem among the Republican’s nominee team, his security staff and supporters. Creating an explosive reaction, said the operative, Scott Foval, was “the whole point of it.”

 

(Snip)

 

Campaign finance records show that the Democratic committee made two payments, one in July and another in August, totaling about $64,000 to Mobilize Inc., a Chicago-based firm connected to Mr. Creamer, for “communications consulting.” The committee said that Mr. Creamer was brought on for something relatively tame: “bracketing,” the industry term for when one party holds a dueling event, like a news conference, to draw attention from an opposition event.

But in the Project Veritas videos, the tactics described went far beyond mere distraction. Mr. Creamer is not seen on the Project Veritas videos approving or endorsing plans to instigate fights at Trump rallies, but his underling, Mr. Foval, is shown boasting about using unseemly methods, like planting people at the gatherings to agitate the crowd.

 

(Snip)

 

* But it was unclear from the Project Veritas videos whether any of the elaborate plans had been carried out. “We do not believe, or have any evidence to suggest, that the activities articulated in the video actually occurred,” said Donna Brazile, the interim Democratic chairwoman. The Clinton campaign similarly denounced the tactics, while chiding Project Veritas, saying it has “been known to offering misleading video out of context.” Mr. Creamer said in a statement on Wednesday that the “unprofessional and careless hypothetical conversations” caught on hidden camera were regrettable, and he denied that any of the “schemes described” had ever taken place.

 

(Snip)

 

__________________________________________________________________________________

 

* See the Above Post

 

[Draggingtree]

An Establishment in Panic

View all posts from this blog

 

By:Pat Buchanan | October 21, 2016

 

Pressed by moderator Chris Wallace as to whether he would accept defeat should Hillary Clinton win the election, Donald Trump replied, "I will tell you at the time. I'll keep you in suspense."

 

"That's horrifying," said Clinton, setting off a chain reaction on the post-debate panels with talking heads falling all over one another in purple-faced anger, outrage and disbelief.

 

"Disqualifying!" was the cry on Clinton cable.

 

"Trump Won't Say If He Will Accept Election Results," wailed the New York Times. "Trump Won't Vow to Honor Results," ran the banner in the Washington Post.

 

But what do these chattering classes and establishment bulletin boards think the Donald is going to do if he falls short of 270 electoral votes?

 

Lead a Coxey's Army on Washington and burn it down as British General Robert Ross did in August 1814, while "Little Jemmy" Madison fled on horseback out the Brookville Road?

 

What explains the hysteria of the establishment?

 

In a word, fear.

https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/-an-establishment-in-panic/

[Draggingtree]

10/20/2016

Throwback Thursday: Remember That RIGGED Al Franken Election?

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 7:19 pm

 

In our headlong rush to make Donald Trump get in a time machine and declare that next month’s election “was” fair — even though it hasn’t happened yet — we all might do well to remember some history that has happened: Al Franken’s 2008 Senate race, won by 312 illegal votes — all of them, and more, illegally cast.

 

This August 2012 piece from Byron York makes for an enjoyable if infuriating read these days.

 

In the ’08 campaign, Republican Sen. Norm Coleman was running for re-election against Democrat Al Franken. It was impossibly close; on the morning after the election, after 2.9 million people had voted, Coleman led Franken by 725 votes.

 

Franken and his Democratic allies dispatched an army of lawyers to challenge the results. After the first canvass, Coleman’s lead was down to 206 votes. That was followed by months of wrangling and litigation. In the end, Franken was declared the winner by 312 votes. He was sworn into office in July 2009, eight months after the election.

 

During the controversy a conservative group called Minnesota Majority began to look into claims of voter fraud. Comparing criminal records with voting rolls, the group identified 1,099 felons — all ineligible to vote — who had voted in the Franken-Coleman race. http://patterico.com/2016/10/20/throwback-thursday-remember-that-rigged-al-franken-election/

[Valin]

[Valin]

[Valin]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIASW2DxzFM

[Valin]

Donna Brazile CANNOT take Megyn Kelly — And It’s Hilariously Uncomfortable (VIDEO)

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVnkPuWvjLg

Tech analysis of emails leaves us wondering how Donna Brazile is still working at the DNC

Jazz Shaw

October 25, 2016

 

Ever since John Podesta’s emails revealed that interim DNC chair Donna Brazile had sent at least one debate question to Hillary Clinton’s team in advance she has denied the charges. Of course, that’s not exactly the case. Nobody seems to have been able to get Donna to say that she didn’t do it. She simply tells us that she won’t be persecuted, while implying that the Russians altered the emails. But could the hackers have done that even if they wished?

 

A new analysis of the suspicious email in question has revealed that not only are the emails likely valid, but it would be nearly impossible for them to have been altered in the way Brazile is suggesting. First we are reminded of the flat denial which Brazile made to Megyn Kelly on Fox when the question was put to her. (Fox News)

 

(Snip)