James Comey and Loretta Lynch Should Be Impeached for Whitewashing Clinton’s Crimes

[Draggingtree]

Observer:

DEPT OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE • Opinion

James Comey and Loretta Lynch Should Be Impeached for Whitewashing Clinton’s Crimes

 

Former federal prosecutor says that Hillary obstructed justice and destroyed evidence—with the support of the president himself

 

By Sidney Powell • 10/11/16 8:30am

Just when one thinks the cavalier cabal of Clinton and her cronies has exhausted all manner of corruption, yet another outrage surfaces, implicating even more people.

 

The bombshell this week is that Loretta Lynch and James Comey not only gave immunity to Hillary’s closest co-conspirators Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson—who, despite being attorneys, destroyed evidence right and left—but, in a secret side deal, agreed to limit the FBI’s review of the Clinton team laptops to pre-January 2015 and to destroy the laptops when the FBI review was complete.

 

Congress and every law-abiding citizen in this country should be outraged. This blatant destruction of evidence is obstruction of justice itself.

 

We no longer have a Department of Justice: We have a Department of Obstructing and Corrupting Justice to protect the power elite of the chosen side.

 

It’s easy to see now why Lynch secretly met Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac on June 27. Only a few days later,

 

[Draggingtree]

Judge Slams Hillary and Huma, Orders Answers

 

Judge Sullivan strikes again, demanding explanation for missing emails from Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills under penalty of perjury

 

By Sidney Powell • 08/01/15 12:56am

While Hillary Clinton’s lawyers are stalling Congress and “negotiating” the terms of her testimony before the Benghazi committee—an option not allowed to ordinary Americans like bankers, executives, or accountants— federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan has hit “Refrigerator Rule #6: Enough Is Enough.” Earlier this week, federal Judge Richard Leon lambasted the State Department lawyers for their stonewalling. Now Judge Sullivan has chiseled a line in concrete. He has given the State Department only a week—until August 7—to get some answers from Hillary Clinton, and her top aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills—under penalty of perjury.

 

Last night on NewsMax TV with Emmy-award winning host Ed Berliner, I noted that Judge Sullivan recently reopened the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by Judicial Watch to obtain emails from Huma Abedin,

http://observer.com/2015/08/judge-sullivan-strikes-again/

[Draggingtree]

James Comey’s Dereliction

Via Billy

Of course the Obama administration was not going to prosecute Hillary Clinton

When considering the recommendation of Federal Bureau of Investigation director James B. Comey against a prosecution of Hillary Clinton over the e-mail scandal, bear two things in mind.

Posted by

Brock Townsend at Wednesday, October 12, 2016 No comments: Links to this post

[Draggingtree]

FBI, DOJ in Disarray Over Comey and Lynch Giving Hillary a Pass

Posted by Aleister October 13, 2016 at 11:00am

“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted.”

 

The decision by the FBI and the Department of Justice not to pursue charges against Hillary Clinton has thrown both federal agencies into a tailspin.

 

James Comey and Loretta Lynch can spin all they want, but average people know they gave Hillary Clinton special treatment, including those average people who work beneath the directors.

 

FOX News reports:

 

FBI, DOJ roiled by Comey, Lynch decision to let Clinton slide by on emails, says insider

 

The decision to let Hillary Clinton off the hook for mishandling classified information has roiled the FBI and Department of Justice, with one person closely involved in the year-long probe telling FoxNews.com that career agents and attorneys on the case unanimously believed the Democratic presidential nominee should have been charged.

(more…)

[Draggingtree]

Editorial

 

Clinton Emails: Comey Lied And The Scandal Died

 

Corruption: When FBI Director James Comey dismissed the case against Hillary Clinton he said it was because no reasonable attorney would take the case. Now we learn that there were plenty who would have done so.

When Comey made his statement about the case in July, he painted a devastating portrait of Hillary Clinton's reckless use of a private email server while Secretary of State.

Clinton knew little to nothing about handling classified material. She sent and received top secret information on an unsecured private email system and was otherwise extremely careless with national security secrets. She likely exposed sensitive material to enemies, and hid thousands of work emails that were supposed to have been turned over. And she or her top staff probably broke the law.

Then, Comey simply shrugged his shoulders and said that "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."

"Reasonable" is the operative word there. This implication is that, while a partisan hack might bring such a case, no legitimate prosecutor would.

http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-emails-fbi-director-comey-lied-and-the-scandal-died/

[Draggingtree]

October 14, 2016

FBI revolt reportedly building against Comey letting Hillary’s obvious violations of Espionage Act go unprosecuted

By Thomas Lifson

James Comey's nightmare scenario is starting to unfold.

 

The American public’s belief in the integrity of the FBI has cratered. Over half of Americans already disagreed with Director James Comey’s decision to not recommend prosecution of Hillary Clinton, after laying out a clear case against her. The FBI is extraordinarily sensitive to its public image because it relies heavily on its prestige in dealing with other law enforcement agencies, legendarily in the habit of taking charge. And The Bureau needs a continuing stream of smart, fit, energetic, well-educated agents seeking careers there. The FBI asks a lot of its professionals, demanding high standards, and working them hard, shipping them around the country, and expecting the work to get done under trying conditions.

 

Any hint that the Bureau has been corrupted will have both immediate and long term consequences.

 

Now, as the election approaches and after months of public silence, an internal revolt of FBI agents against the decision is starting to become public, as yet via anonymous sources. Malia Zimmerman and Adam Housley report for Fox News:

americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/fbi_revolt_reportedly_building_against_comey_letting_hillarys_obvious_violations_of_espionage_act_go_unprosecuted.