There’s No Such Thing As ‘Reproductive Rights’

[Draggingtree]

:
There’s No Such Thing As ‘Reproductive Rights’

By Steve Berman | June 28, 2016, 09:01am

The august and intellectually corpulent vultures–who in groups are known as a committee–writing as the Washington Post Editorial Board, declared that the “Supreme Court saves reproductive freedom.” It’s pure fiction.There’s no such thing as reproductive freedom, or reproductive rights. They don’t exist.

 

The Supreme Court’s job is to interpret the Constitution. The Constitution grants no rights to anyone. The Constitution defends rights that already exist from being infringed by a power-hungry government, made up of error-prone human beings. That document bears no mention of “reproductive rights,” or even “privacy.” Justice Louis Brandeis conjured up “privacy” from the Constitution like some preachers find “send me cash so God can bless you” from the Scriptures.

And in Roe v. Wade, the Court conjured up a right to abortion based on the pretend-right to privacy. It doesn’t exist. And Monday, the Supreme Court, led by Justice Breyer, upheld a human-designed fantasy, and those who believe in that fantasy cheered.