Geee Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Powerline: We and others have great fun tracking the duplicitous corrections at the New York Times, but the correction of Nick Kristof’s column last Saturday, “Is Hillary Clinton Dishonest?“, sets a new Olympic record. Kristof’s column, as it reads online right now, relies on an evaluation by PolitiFact in the following way: PolitiFact, the Pulitzer Prize-winning fact-checking site, calculates that of the Clinton statements it has examined, 50 percent are either true or mostly true. That compares to 49 percent for Bernie Sanders’s, 9 percent for Trump’s, 22 percent for Ted Cruz’s and 52 percent for John Kasich’s. Here we have a rare metric of integrity among candidates, and it suggests that contrary to popular impressions, Clinton is relatively honest — by politician standards. And at the bottom of the column is this short correction: Correction: April 23, 2016: An earlier version of this column misstated some of the percentages of true statements as judged by PolitiFact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Sweet @Geee! Just following Alinsky Journalism 101. Repeating the lie until it establishes itself as "fact." Bold statement on Editorial Page #1-----small correction at the bottom of the obituaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now