Draggingtree Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 : Monday, June 1, 2015 So You Want To Vote Republican? So you want to know who to vote for in 2016? All right, let's talk this through. First of all, while you don't think you voted for Barack Obama, you did. The fact that you voted at all, or for anyone, validated the vote for Barack Obama. It lent credence to an election that, not knowing that you had been defrauded, it was a legitimate election. It was not.The reason I brought that up at the outset was to establish context under which all the rest of this post will be written.One must understand that what we have had for a long time is an acquiescence to voter fraud. What voter fraud does is disenfranchise every legal voter of the nation. When a person votes illegally, it takes one person who voted legally out of the process. It is a one for one exchange. The fact that democrats and republicans alike (no matter what they say to garner one's vote) have acquiesced to the fact that illegal immigrants vote is a slap in the face to every legal citizen of this nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draggingtree Posted April 4, 2016 Author Share Posted April 4, 2016 SCOTUS: In drawing voting Districts, states can count non-votersPosted by Sarah Rumpf April 4, 2016 at 5:15pm Court rules that “one person, one vote” may include total population, not just total voters. On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a unanimous ruling in Evenwel v. Abbott, a voting rights case that dealt with how districts are drawn. The opinion was written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, with Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito concurring. With the unanimous ruling, Justice Antonin Scalia’s death was not a direct factor in this decision, but since the Court left a major issue still open, the critical question of who will fill Scalia’s seat still looms. When drawing district lines, who should be counted?The case originated when two Texas residents, Sue Evenwel and Edward Pfenninger, challenged the state’s legislative redistricting, which currently includes the total population of the area, as is commonly done across the country. The plaintiffs argued in favor of counting only those residents who were actual voters to draw the districts. http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/04/scotus-in-drawing-voting-districts-states-can-count-non-voters/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now