Obama sets record as losingest loser President in loser history

[Geee]

Redstate.com:

Larry Sabato has an interesting article in Politico asking the intriguing question why any political party would want to have the presidency for two terms given the damage that does to the party in Congress and in the States:

 

The historical record is clear: A party surges when it elects a president, but goes into a roller-coaster decline shortly thereafter. Even if a party makes up significant ground in the president’s reelection campaign, by the end of the eight-year cycle, it is in worse shape, sometimes (as with Obama) much worse.

One wonders whether a party’s top elected officials would be quite so gung-ho about winning the White House if they focused on who is going to pay the piper.

Democrats and Republicans will give little attention to these grim numbers, of course, and as usual they will gear up and do whatever is necessary to take the big prize in 2016. Yet it should be a consolation to the eventual losers that at every other level of public office, they’ll almost certainly be better off in the not-too-distant future.

[Draggingtree]

Can Congress Censure Obama?

John Yoo December 2, 2014

Republicans opposed to President Obama’s immigration order are floating the idea of Congress voting to “censure” the President. Liberals are suggesting censure is unconstitutional because the Constitution nowhere authorizes Congress to censure anybody.

 

People who think a censure bill clearly is unconstitutional take censure too seriously and the Constitution not seriously enough. https://ricochet.com/can-congress-censure-obama/