Jump to content

A FURTHER PERSPECTIVE GUTTING THE FIRST AMENDMENT


Geee

Recommended Posts

gutting-first-amendmentAmerican Spectator:

Supporters of campaign finance laws have been apoplectic since the Supreme Court struck down a ban on corporate political ads in Citizens United. Having lost another big case this year in McCutcheon v. FEC, they now want to write their views directly into the Constitution.

 

Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved a resolution calling for a constitutional amendment that would let government limit contributions to candidates and spending by and on behalf of them. The House will take up a similar proposal soon. To see where this amendment would lead if enacted, consider that the law in Citizens United prevented a group from distributing a film that criticized Hillary Clinton during her last presidential bid. During arguments in the case, the government’s lawyer admitted that the law could apply to books as well.

 

At the core of this effort is the very dangerous view that freedom of speech isn’t an inalienable individual right—a right to say what you want regardless of what others think—but a privilege that we exercise at the sufferance of “the public.”Scissors-32x32.png

 


Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Geee

 

HEY! You can't say that!!! angry.png I am OFFENDED I DEMAND someone do something! (You can tell just how serious I am by my use of BOLDED CAPITAL LETTERS)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1708706815
×
×
  • Create New...