Congress Should Veto Obama’s War

[Draggingtree]

The American Conservative: Congress Should Veto Obama’s War

By Patrick J. Buchanan • August 27, 2013, 12:00 AM

 

“Congress doesn’t have a whole lot of core responsibilities,” said Barack Obama last week in an astonishing remark.

 

For in the Constitution, Congress appears as the first branch of government. And among its enumerated powers are the power to tax, coin money, create courts, provide for the common defense, raise and support an army, maintain a navy and declare war.

 

But, then, perhaps Obama’s contempt is justified.

 

For consider Congress’ broad assent to news that Obama has decided to attack Syria, a nation that has not attacked us and against which Congress has never authorized a war.

 

Why is Obama making plans to launch cruise missiles on Syria?

According to a “senior administration official … who insisted on anonymity,” President Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons on his own people last week in the two-year-old Syrian civil war.

 

But who deputized the United States to walk the streets of the world pistol-whipping bad actors. Where does our imperial president come off drawing “red lines” and ordering nations not to cross them?

 

Neither the Security Council nor Congress nor NATO nor the Arab League has authorized war on Syria.

 

[Draggingtree]

[NCTexan]

 

 

He said "Impeach".... ha ha ha... ha ha ha

 

 

Not sure why so many folks (even our folks) are making such a big deal that a few Republicans used that word in a sentence.

 

Seemed to be pretty common DEM vernacular a few years ago...not just from some party outiers but from their recognized leadership across the board.