Geee Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Daily Caller: Despite the picture the White House released showing President Obama intently watching the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, his former “body man” says the president spent most of the raid playing a card game. “Most people were like down in the Situation Room and [the president] was like, ‘I’m not going to be down there, I can’t watch this entire thing.’ So he, myself, Pete Souza, the White House photographer, Marvin [Nicholson], we must have played 15 games of spades,” former Obama aide Reggie Love said at an event in Los Angeles sponsored by The Artists & Athletes Alliance in July. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickydog Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Words fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casino67 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geee Posted August 16, 2013 Author Share Posted August 16, 2013 YouTube video of Reggie Love interview deleted after comments hit Drudge http://washingtonexaminer.com/youtube-video-of-reggie-love-interview-deleted-after-comments-hit-drudge/article/2534287 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Look everybody, it's a Bright Shiny Thing!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Words fail. Actually I have two words...Who Cares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickydog Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Words fail. Actually I have two words...Who Cares. Actually, come to think of it, you're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Words fail. Actually I have two words...Who Cares. Actually, come to think of it, you're right. No, @nickydog, he's not right. People care when the lies of their pResident are exposed. @Valin.....oh Swami of Snark.....you keep correcting us....attempting to try & make us think the way you do. It may be right for you, but not everybody believes the same things, or cares the same way as you. Please take this into consideration when you slam things that others may deem valid, despite your own thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 @Casino67! I can't see Reggie Love-rboy in that pic......is he below the Obum? That picture [the original] is supposedly photo-shopped to place the 1st liar in it. The same Obamunists that created the "birth certificate" may have been involved. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 That is the Ace of Spades. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 @SrWoodchuck Remember BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome)? In which the Left told everything George W Bush did was illegal, immoral, unconstitutional and guaranteed to scare the dog. Remember how really insane they looked? I see the same thing now on our side. As regards to this story, he sat in the nexr room (getting up dates) and played cards until the raid was going to happen. And this is a story...Why? I mean other than giving the Left a golden opportunity to make us look silly. All I can assume is Jamie Weinstein (and others) needed a story. It didn't may=tter that it was pretty much a nothing story, he neded to fill space. Last time I checked there were 739,122 reasons to not like, to not support, to criticize Barack Obama...this story is not one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 @SrWoodchuck Remember BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome)? In which the Left told everything George W Bush did was illegal, immoral, unconstitutional and guaranteed to scare the dog. Remember how really insane they looked? I see the same thing now on our side. As regards to this story, he sat in the nexr room (getting up dates) and played cards until the raid was going to happen. And this is a story...Why? I mean other than giving the Left a golden opportunity to make us look silly. All I can assume is Jamie Weinstein (and others) needed a story. It didn't may=tter that it was pretty much a nothing story, he neded to fill space. Last time I checked there were 739,122 reasons to not like, to not support, to criticize Barack Obama...this story is not one of them. @Valin Again....you miss the point. The point is not BDS, Leftist abhorrence of us, Jamie Weinstein.....or 739,122 reasons not to like.... The point is that YOU are trying to determine what is an appropriate comment or response to a post, by your snarky condescending comments. I don't need your permission to feel, act or post differently....and neither does anyone else here @ TRR. Please don't try to moderate me into your neat little box of proper responses. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 @SrWoodchuck Remember BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome)? In which the Left told everything George W Bush did was illegal, immoral, unconstitutional and guaranteed to scare the dog. Remember how really insane they looked? I see the same thing now on our side. As regards to this story, he sat in the nexr room (getting up dates) and played cards until the raid was going to happen. And this is a story...Why? I mean other than giving the Left a golden opportunity to make us look silly. All I can assume is Jamie Weinstein (and others) needed a story. It didn't may=tter that it was pretty much a nothing story, he neded to fill space. Last time I checked there were 739,122 reasons to not like, to not support, to criticize Barack Obama...this story is not one of them. @Valin Again....you miss the point. The point is not BDS, Leftist abhorrence of us, Jamie Weinstein.....or 739,122 reasons not to like.... The point is that YOU are trying to determine what is an appropriate comment or response to a post, by your snarky condescending comments. I don't need your permission to feel, act or post differently....and neither does anyone else here @ TRR. Please don't try to moderate me into your neat little box of proper responses. Thank you. I am not in any way trying to determine with is appropriate to post. U do however reserve the right to point out what I consider to be a silly nothing story, when it is posted. Just because someone from the right or is considered from the Right publishes a story, that does not automatically mean it is valid. There are Right Wing sources and Right wing sources, just as there are Left wing sources and left wing sources...if you know what I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 @SrWoodchuck Remember BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome)? In which the Left told everything George W Bush did was illegal, immoral, unconstitutional and guaranteed to scare the dog. Remember how really insane they looked? I see the same thing now on our side. As regards to this story, he sat in the nexr room (getting up dates) and played cards until the raid was going to happen. And this is a story...Why? I mean other than giving the Left a golden opportunity to make us look silly. All I can assume is Jamie Weinstein (and others) needed a story. It didn't may=tter that it was pretty much a nothing story, he neded to fill space. Last time I checked there were 739,122 reasons to not like, to not support, to criticize Barack Obama...this story is not one of them. @Valin Again....you miss the point. The point is not BDS, Leftist abhorrence of us, Jamie Weinstein.....or 739,122 reasons not to like.... The point is that YOU are trying to determine what is an appropriate comment or response to a post, by your snarky condescending comments. I don't need your permission to feel, act or post differently....and neither does anyone else here @ TRR. Please don't try to moderate me into your neat little box of proper responses. Thank you. I am not in any way trying to determine with is appropriate to post. U do however reserve the right to point out what I consider to be a silly nothing story, when it is posted. Just because someone from the right or is considered from the Right publishes a story, that does not automatically mean it is valid. There are Right Wing sources and Right wing sources, just as there are Left wing sources and left wing sources...if you know what I mean. @Valin! You know what works better than snark and leaves everyone thinking that they can still have their own opinion? Something like this: " I consider [this] to be a silly nothing story....because......." People can take only so much....."against-the-grain"......[unless it refers to Obama & Obamunists-then....sky's the limit] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 @SrWoodchuck Snark is what I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 @SrWoodchuck Snark is what I do. @Valin! .....and you do it very well....but sometimes your snark makes it seem that there can "be only one......" opinion.... You may have honed your snark "too sharp" on the "other" sites......pull in the claws & use a scalpel, with a judicious leavening of satire.....if I can mix metaphors..... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 @SrWoodchuck Snark is what I do. @Valin! .....and you do it very well....but sometimes your snark makes it seem that there can "be only one......" opinion.... You may have honed your snark "too sharp" on the "other" sites......pull in the claws & use a scalpel, with a judicious leavening of satire.....if I can mix metaphors..... No No No. I am sweetness and light compared to what I was there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 @SrWoodchuck Snark is what I do. @Valin! .....and you do it very well....but sometimes your snark makes it seem that there can "be only one......" opinion.... You may have honed your snark "too sharp" on the "other" sites......pull in the claws & use a scalpel, with a judicious leavening of satire.....if I can mix metaphors..... No No No. I am sweetness and light compared to what I was there. Well.......then.........thanks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now