Valin Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 AEI: John R. Bolton 6/10/13 Since 2011, when Libyans overthrew and killed Moammar Gadhafi, a little-noticed but highly significant legal battle has been fought over who will prosecute those in his regime accused of human-rights abuses. In particular, the fate of his son, Saif al-Islam Gadhafi, is the subject of an enormous struggle between Libya's post-Gadhafi government and the International Criminal Court (ICC). Will Libya's new government or the ICC try Saif for crimes committed during his father's rule and the civil war that ousted him? This is not a dry-as-dust dispute over the jurisdiction of competing courts but a fundamental political issue about national responsibility and sovereignty with profound implications for the United States. When the ICC treaty was under negotiation, supporters argued it would be needed only when a country's legal system wouldn't prosecute its own citizens. The complementarity doctrine, they contended, would ensure that nations prepared to take responsibility for crimes committed in their names would be free to do so. Of course, no one had any idea how the abstract, untested complementarity theory would actually work.......(Snip) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now