Jump to content

California Dems push anti-fracking bills, aim to curb potential oil bonanza


WestVirginiaRebel

Recommended Posts

WestVirginiaRebel
california-dems-push-anti-fracking-billsFox News:

California is on the verge of a new gold rush. Expanded hydraulic fracturing -- or "fracking" -- at the Monterey Shale formation is sparking estimates that 15 billion barrels of oil could be accessed, along with millions of jobs and huge contributions to the domestic energy supply.

Even the state's green-friendly Democratic governor, Jerry Brown, says "the potential is extraordinary."

But standing in the way is a flurry of anti-fracking bills. At last count, 10 were on the table, all introduced by Democrats seeking tighter controls over the controversial technology.

Some of the measures take aim at how crude is extracted from rock layers beyond the reach of conventional drilling.

Others call for full disclosure of what chemicals are used in the high-pressure process, how they're removed, and where they're stored.

California State Sen. Fran Pavley, a longtime environmental activist, is pushing for a fracking moratorium until more studies are done on the potential risks, particularly to the groundwater supply.

"With hydraulic fracturing, hundreds of gallons of water, laced with chemicals, sand ... can go horizontally underground. ... We don't know enough," she said.

Fracking has been around in California for decades. It's a standard step in oil drilling, and while health problems have been reported in states like Colorado and Pennsylvania, the technology has a clean safety record in the Golden State. But critics argue it's virtually impossible to know exactly where, or how often, fracking operations are occurring.

"Companies aren't required to report fracking to anyone -- not the state or the federal government," said Patrick Sullivan, with the Center for Biological Diversity. "Some have made their fracking public, but they certainly don't have to."

Even so, supporters say bills seeking more studies and rules are, at this point, premature -- and could jeopardize a potential bonanza.

"Why would you want to curtail energy production, with a technology that has proved to be safe, and (deny) the folks in the regions of the state where those benefits are going to accrue? That just doesn't make any sense," argued Tupper Hull, with the Western States Petroleum Association.

________

 

Because it's California, where they will look for any excuse to drive jobs out of the state...


Link to comment
Share on other sites

On behalf of my brothers family who live in ND, I would just like to say Thank You California Legislature!

 

 

""Companies aren't required to report fracking to anyone -- not the state or the federal government," said Patrick Sullivan"

 

Calling BS on that Patty ma lad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Blast From The Past

 

Aug 14, 2012

 

This week on Uncommon Knowledge, the Chairman of Chief Oil and Gas Trevor Rees-Jones discusses fracking—what it is and why it is crucial to the country's future, the challenge of discovering and distributing cheap energy, and why our gas prices will (and should) go up in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1715646941
×
×
  • Create New...