Jump to content

The U.S. Army’s Readiness Crisis


Recommended Posts


Max Boot



No one is seriously proposing sending large numbers of U.S. ground forces to Syria (military options are generally limited to the use of airpower and the provision of arms and training to the rebels), but it’s still dismaying to hear General Ray Odierno, the army chief of staff, warn that we will soon lose the ability to send troops even if the president wanted to. Odierno just told reporters, as quoted by Foreign Policy:


“Readiness is OK right now, but it’s degrading significantly because our training is reducing. So, the next three, four months, we probably have the capability to do it,” he said, of a Syrian incursion. “Next year, it becomes a little bit more risky.”


“If you ask me today, we have forces that can go. I think it will change over time because the longer we go cancelling training and reducing our training, the readiness levels go down.”




Just because sequestration is no longer front-page news doesn’t mean it’s not having an impact—it is, and that impact, as Odierno warned, will grow worse over time. If Congress waits too long to act, it may take years to restore readiness back to existing levels. Given how dangerous the world is (think just of North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, and Syria), that is time we don’t have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1701933100
  • Create New...