WestVirginiaRebel Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Los Angeles Times: WASHINGTON — After two decades in which gay rights moved from the margin to capture the support of most Americans, the Supreme Court justices will go behind closed doors this week to decide whether now is the time to rule on whether gays and lesbians have a constitutional right to marry. For justices, the issue is not just what to decide, but when to decide it. In times past, the court has been faulted for waiting too long or moving too quickly to recognize constitutional rights. The justices did not strike down state bans on interracial marriage until 1967, 13 years after they had declared racial segregation unconstitutional. Yet in response to the growing women's rights movement, the court in 1973 struck down all the state laws restricting abortion, triggering a national "right to life" movement and drawing criticism even from some supporters that the Roe vs. Wade ruling had gone too far too fast. Now, the justices must decide whether to hear an appeal from the defenders of California's Proposition 8, the 2008 voter initiative that limited marriage to a man and a woman. TIMELINE: Gay marriage through the years At the same session Friday, the court will sift through several appeals to decide whether legally married gay couples have a right to equal benefits under federal law. Appeals courts in Boston and New York have struck down the part of the Defense of Marriage Act that denies such a right, and the justices are almost certain to take up a case to resolve that question. ________ Gay marriage goes to the Supremes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantim Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Well if Obamcare is any indication..... Gay marriage is just another "tax." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rokke Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Actually, it would be another tax. Since most gays aren't really interested in the religious aspect of marriage, they want it for the financial benefits. They pay less (or more likely get more) and everyone else foots the bill. At least we won't have to pay for their birth control. Er...nevermind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now