Jump to content

Scuttling of the Great Green Fleet


Geee

Recommended Posts

scuttling-of-the-great-green-fleetHuman Events:

The Senate markup of the 2013 National Defense Appropriations Act late last month dealt a grave blow to the liberal green agenda that has taken hold of the Defense Department.

Like the version of the bill that passed the Republican-controlled House, the Senate version censures military plans to invest heavily in costly biofuels to power ships and aircraft.

In recent months, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Navy Secretary Ray Mabus have made no secret of their intentions to support the infant biofuels industry, using the alternative fuels at the rate of $26 a gallon to power a “Great Green Fleet” intended to launch for training this summer and deploy in 2016.

“We can break the market,” Mabus boasted at a gala sponsored by the Environmental Defense Fund in May.

Human Events first reported the story in its May 14 analysis, “The Green Monster.”

While the Navy purchased 450,000 gallons of biofuels last December at about four times the cost of oil—the largest government purchase of its kind to date—the department may be barred from buying another gallon.

“I think most of the members of the Democrats looked at this and said, ‘this is not a winning issue,’” Sen. Jim. Inhofe (R-Okla.) told Human Events.

Alternative fuel limits

The Democratic-controlled Senate Armed Services Committee voted 13-12 in late May to include two amendments sponsored by Inhofe and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) that would prohibit the military from purchasing alternative fuel in the next fiscal year if it cost more than traditional fuel sources, except for use in specific research and development projects; and would bar the Defense Department from funding a biofuels refinery. Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and Jim Webb (D-Va.) supported the first amendment; while Sens. Webb and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) supported the second.

Now, the House and Senate will face off over a provision that exempts the Defense Department from a 2007 statute stipulating that any alternative fuels purchased by the government must have lower carbon emissions than traditional fuel sources, a de facto prohibition on use of oil sands, oil shale, and other promising alternatives.

The language was approved in the House bill but failed in the Senate Armed Services Committee on a tie vote, 13-13. When the two bodies meet in conference to reconcile their versions of the bill following Senate passage of the legislation this summer, Inhofe is confident that the exemption will prevail.

“The Senate conferees are going to have an awful hard time saying they don’t want that provision, because it was split right down the middle,” he said. “Logically, (the decision) goes to the House.”

Less clear is how military leadership and the administration will respond to being stymied in Congress.

When asked about the move by Congress to prevent military expenditures on biofuels, Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter was reserved.

“Obviously, we asked for the freedom to do that,” he said. “It would have been good if we had the freedom to do that.”

Carter did not expound further on biofuels, but said that the military in some instances was justified in paying higher prices as a first adopter for technology that served as an aid to military readiness.

He did not comment on whether the House and Senate amendments would alter Navy plans to launch the Great Green Fleet.Scissors-32x32.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Obama administration's proposed Green Troop Carrier is said to offer fuel economy over the current Humvee.

 

clown-car.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Obama administration's proposed Green Troop Carrier is said to offer fuel economy over the current Humvee.

 

clown-car.jpg

And there's Obama riding in it!!!wink.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

More news from The Planet Stupid....

 

Reuters

"Green Fleet" sails, meets stiff headwinds in Congress... $26 per Gallon Bio-fuel

 

(Reuters) A U.S. Navy oiler slipped away from a fuel depot on the Puget Sound in Washington state one recent day, headed toward the central Pacific and into the storm over the Pentagon's controversial green fuels initiative.

 

In its tanks, the USNS Henry J. Kaiser carried nearly 900,000 gallons of biofuel blended with petroleum to power the cruisers, destroyers and fighter jets of what the Navy has taken to calling the "Great Green Fleet," the first carrier strike group to be powered largely by alternative fuels.

 

Conventionally powered ships and aircraft in the strike group will burn the blend in an operational setting for the first time this month during the 22-nation Rim of the Pacific exercise, the largest annual international maritime warfare maneuvers. The six-week exercise began on Friday.

The Pentagon hopes it can prove the Navy looks as impressive burning fuel squeezed from seeds, algae and chicken fat as it does using petroleum.

But the demonstration, years in the making, may be a Pyrrhic victory.

 

Some Republican lawmakers have seized on the fuel's $26-a-gallon price, compared to $3.60 for conventional fuel. They paint the program as a waste of precious funds at a time when the U.S. government's budget remains severely strained, the Pentagon is facing cuts and energy companies are finding big quantities of oil and gas in the United States.

 

Damned Republicans always getting tangled up in the picky little details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1714637287
×
×
  • Create New...