Jump to content

Seizing the Wealth of Landlords, One District at a Time


Geee

Recommended Posts

seizing_the_wealth_of_landlords_one_district_at_a_time.html
American Thinker:

The real property of the landlord class is being liquidated, slowly but steadily, in one odd corner of America, with the nation as a whole blissfully unaware of the slow-motion seizure underway. In Washington, D.C., before the very eyes of the world's media, the rental property of landlords is being handed over to their tenants, step by careful step.

After Congress granted the District home rule in 1973, its elected officials found thumbing their nose at the city's former overseers more rewarding than trying to run a competent and honest government. Since then, several city agencies and programs have been forced into court-ordered receiverships because of the District's utter ineptitude in managing them. But that has barely made a dent in the psyche of local politicians. Although they often wax eloquent about how much they care about the District's most vulnerable residents, the receiverships, scandals, and multiple screw-ups that have continued to plague the city for decades have exposed the utter insincerity that lies behind these pronouncements.

Although the District has been forced to clean up its act a bit, there remains a host of less publicized policy failures, destructive in their own right, that each year sap millions of dollars from the wallets of taxpayers, both local and nationwide. Keep in mind that Congress subsidizes D.C. operations each year and that that "fix" helps the city maintain policies which should have found their way to the circular file decades ago.

In 1970, shortly before the District was granted home rule, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia got the ball rolling by making the District a crucible for the Court's own far-flung experiment in social engineering. Building on President Johnson's Great Society endeavor, which relied on the newly-enacted Civil Rights Act and federal taxing and spending authority to address the lingering effects of slavery on the nation's inner cities, the Court cast aside a centuries-old common law tenet and empowered D.C. tenants to simply stop paying rent if their landlords were derelict in correcting serious housing code violations in their units.

Notwithstanding the fact that city officials had administrative mechanisms in place to enforce the local housing code, permitting tenants to withhold rent was, to the Court, a facile way of enriching tenants while casting local landlords as the villain.

Tenants soon started taking advantage of the Court's largesse by withholding rent, even when only minor violations, or none at all, existed. And tenants also learned that when faced with bills they could not pay, they could simply stop paying rent, charge their landlords with failing to meet their obligations under the local housing code, and squeeze out a rent abatement, thus allowing them to make ends meet. All too often, tenants even manufactured their own code violations and called city housing inspectors to issue citations to their landlords. Despite the fact that these homemade code violations were obviously self-inflicted, housing inspectors were happy to go along with the gamesmanship. In fact, it became their job to do so.

Before long, District tenants also realized that there was money to be made in organized, building-wide rent strikes. The leverage created by such strikes left landlords with few alternatives but to settle with their tenants, in order to reinstate the flow of income needed to pay for building upkeep, to service loans secured by their properties, and to avoid the gargantuan legal bills that having to sue volumes of tenants at one time generates. Eventually, tenants also acquired the statutory right of first refusal to buy the buildings in which they reside and to assign that right to a developer in exchange for a quick cash payment. Over the years, then, District tenants have acquired something akin to an ownership interest in their landlords' properties, courtesy of the United States Court of Appeals and the District's elected officials.snip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1709471829
×
×
  • Create New...