Jump to content

Crooked Cuomo?


Geee

Recommended Posts

crooked-cuomo
American Spectator:

National security mascot Rudy Giuliani is back in the headlines this week for his latest project with private consulting firm Giuliani Partners. America's mayor is considering taking a spokesman job with the Entergy Corporation, which operates two reactors at the Indian Point nuclear plant in Buchanan, New York, just 35 miles outside New York City. Giuliani Partners has done some P.R. work for Entergy in the past -- during safety controversies in early 2003 and again in 2006 -- but this is an entirely different situation. Though it generates 25 to 30 percent of the city's energy and pumps $126 million a year in labor wages into the local economy, the Indian Point plant is now facing extinction.

In late June, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo sent "one of his top advisers" to meet with Entergy officials and inform them that he is planning to close the Indian Point site. The original 40-year operating permits for the reactors are set to expire in 2013 and 2015, respectively. Though Entergy is applying for a permit renewal from the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Cuomo can effectively terminate that application. All he has to do is withhold a certain water permit that is necessary for Entergy to win the renewal. According to the New York Times, Cuomo's plan -- supposedly based on fear of a meltdown or terrorism -- is shortsighted. It "would take years and require a long-term energy strategy" to wean New York off Indian Point's private-sector 2,000 megawatts of energy, which currently light up schools and businesses across New York City and Westchester County.

Mayor Bloomberg strongly opposes Indian Point's closure and predicts profound economic consequences. According to a leaked preliminary draft of a report by New York City's Department of Environmental Conservation, Indian Point's closure would result in the city's energy costs rising up to 10 percent, with 1,100 layoffs at Indian Point and citywide reliability problems beginning within a year of the second reactor's expiration.
So why is Cuomo so determined to close the site now? After all, he's always maintained that he's "not against nuclear power."

Cuomo, of course, took $100,000 in campaign contributions in 2010 from his top individual donor Dan Tishman -- chairman of the Board of the National Resources Defense Council, which ranks as one of the most active anti-nuclear special interest groups.

He also took $50,000 from the New York law firm Kaplan Fox and Kilsheimer -- one of his top ten organizational donors. That firm's veteran counsel Charles J. Moxley sits on the board of the anti-nuclear Lawyers' Committee for Nuclear Policy and also wrote an anti-nuclear book.snip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1714776560
×
×
  • Create New...