Casino67 Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Rightsidenews.com:Judicial Watch and the Media Research Center have obtained potentially explosive e-mails that could prove Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan provided misleading answers during her Senate confirmation hearings when she said she had no involvement as U.S. Solicitor General in any strategizing over how to defend the health care reform law known as Obamacare. Whether or not she had any such involvement is crucial in determining whether she must recuse herself from cases dealing with the constitutionality of Obamacare.Moreover, if the evidence does establish Kagan’s involvement as Solicitor General, Justice Kagan may have violated federal law governing recusals. That is because she evidently decided to participate in the decision of the Supreme Court in April 2011 not to “fast-track” for Supreme Court review Virginia’s lawsuit challenging Obamacare.Federal statute 28 U.S.C. 455 states that a judge must step aside “in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned” or in which he (or she) “participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy.”During her Senate confirmation hearings for a seat on the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan denied any substantive personal involvement in connection with her Office of Solicitor General’s provision of legal advice on Obamacare or consideration of litigation strategies to defend Obamacare from constitutional challenges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanguine Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 So, if this is true, our only remedy is impeachment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casino67 Posted May 25, 2011 Author Share Posted May 25, 2011 So, if this is true, our only remedy is impeachment? Don't really know, but whatever happens has to start in the Senate which is Dhimmo controlled. So the Judiciary committee will probably ignore the entire situation. I'm sure they consider Judicial Watch and MRC very right-wing organizations, easily ignored by them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now