Geee Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 LATimes:The 5-4 decision represents one of the largest prison release orders in U.S. history. The court majority says overcrowding has caused 'suffering and death.' In a sharp dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia warns 'terrible things are sure to happen.'WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ordered California on Monday to release tens of thousands of its prisoners to relieve overcrowding, saying that "needless suffering and death" had resulted from putting too many inmates into facilities that cannot hold them in decent conditions.It is one of the largest prison release orders in the nation's history, and it sharply split the high court.RELATEDDisturbance at Sacramento-area prison leaves several inmates injuredDocument: Read the annotated Supreme Court decisionVideo by prison guards union links campaign donations to new contractJustices upheld an order from a three-judge panel in California that called for releasing 38,000 to 46,000 prisoners. Since then, the state has transferred about 9,000 state inmates to county jails. As a result, the total prison population is now about 32,000 more than the capacity limit set by the panel.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, speaking for the majority, said California's prisons had "fallen short of minimum constitutional requirements" because of overcrowding. As many as 200 prisoners may live in gymnasium, he said, and as many as 54 prisoners share a single toilet.Kennedy insisted that the state had no choice but to release more prisoners. The justices, however, agreed that California officials should be given more time to make the needed reductions.In dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia called the ruling "staggering" and "absurd." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCJim Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 If they can't do the time .... Don't do the crime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casino67 Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 Do the D's trust the released to vote next year? Could be a real conundrum for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evad Posted May 23, 2011 Share Posted May 23, 2011 "overcrowding has caused 'suffering and death.' " Need more space? Utah has huge canyons. Drop em in, seal each end, survival of the fittest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geee Posted May 24, 2011 Author Share Posted May 24, 2011 Illinois has that big empty prison that will now not be Gitmo II! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Major Investment Opportunities: Ankle monitor manufacturing! Moat builders! Crocodile wranglers! Guard dog breeders! Spanish language teachers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestVirginiaRebel Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Fox News:A sharply divided Supreme Court Monday affirmed a controversial prisoner reduction plan forced on California prison administrators that requires the state to reduce its inmate population by tens-of-thousands to ease overcrowding.The 5-4 decision authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, a California native, is a wholesale acceptance of a ruling by a special three-judge panel tasked with resolving chronic overcrowding in the state's penal system. The February 2009 decision orders California to reduce its prison population that has at times run nearly double its capacity. Approximately 37,000 to 46,000 inmates will have to be released in order for the state to comply with the ruling."After years of litigation, it became apparent that a remedy for the constitutional violations would not be effective absent a reduction in the prison system population," Kennedy wrote in an opinion joined by the court's more liberal members. In an unusual occurrence, the opinion included an appendix showing three pictures of the overcrowded facilities.Critics of California's prison system contend the cells are so overrun with inmates that proper care has been obliterated. Kennedy cites examples of prisoners with mental or physical health needs having to wait months for inadequate care. He cites one example of an inmate who was held for nearly 24 hours in a cage and standing in a pool of his own urine. Others died while seeking medical attention that was seemingly delayed because of the backlog of cases."If a prison deprives prisoners of basic sustenance, including adequate medical care, the courts have a responsibility to remedy the resulting Eighth Amendment violation," Kennedy declared noting the Constitution's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.The ruling gives the state some flexibility when it comes to how it goes about reducing its prison population even suggesting that three judge panel that originally issued the order could extend a two-year compliance order if it felt the state was making progress in its efforts to reduce the inmate population to 137.5 percent of capacity.While Kennedy recognized the "grave concern" of releasing prisoners in large numbers he nonetheless supported the premise that the state's prisons have simply become too overcrowded."Absent compliance through new construction, out-of-state transfers, or other means ... the state will be required to release some number of prisoners before their full sentences have been served."________California is already an asylum...those who are left probably won't notice the difference... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now