Jump to content

White House asked California paper to take out unflattering remark about first lady


Geee

Recommended Posts

white-house-asked-california-paper-to-take-out-unflattering-remark-about-first-lady
Daily Caller:

A small weekly paper in California claims that a White House official asked it to remove a sentence from a “benign” feature about Marine One because it reflected poorly on first lady Michelle Obama.

In an email to The Daily Caller, Gina Channell-Allen, president of the Pleasanton Weekly in Pleasanton, California, said that her paper “received a call from the White House asking us to take out part of the story because it reflected poorly on the First Lady.”

The story in question was a soft feature about Marine One titled, “Inside Marine One, President Obama’s helicopter,” that ran in the paper on April 20. Pleasanton staffer Amory Gutierrez “didn’t get to ride in ‘Marine One,’” she wrote in her story, “but I did get the VIP tour and took photographs of the otherwise unseen aircraft.”

She also wrote a sentence that the White House thought made FLOTUS look snooty.

“Basically the reporter said that the First Lady didn’t speak to the pilots but acknowledged them by making eye contact,” Allen wrote in her email.snip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This kind of reminded me of some of the reports from the Insider at the Ulsterman Report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

Control the media......control the message......control the masses.

 

Not a peep about Mz. Gutierrez's latino heritage, related to her "shanking" by the Obama machine. [Repub's would get no pass]

 

"....she didn't speak to her military servants pilots.....she acknowleged them by making eye contact...."

 

 

Sumtin' like 'dis?

 

 

michelle_obama05-1_thumb7.jpg?imgmax=800

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, at least they didn't say anything about her huge arse..

you know, the one she's married to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Without knowing the identity of this "Democrat Operative" it is hard to give any credibility to this story. If true, though, it bears out what most of us here have stated over and over...that "o" is a stuffed shirt. It is scary that we don't really know who is running the country.

 

I would be very interested as to the nature of the "legal problems" alluded to in the story. "o" seems to have more skeletons in his closet than anyone would have guessed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

Well, at least they didn't say anything about her huge arse..

you know, the one she's married to.

shoutEvad! :lmfao:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this may have had an earlier part to it. Very interesting.

 

From the same site:

 

"Black House Insider: Exciting, Ulsterman Regrets His White House Insider Lies About Obama"

 

Was reading the initial post above about Jarrett and Daley and just couldn't bring myself to believe the story. Just a little too 'juicy'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

I think this may have had an earlier part to it. Very interesting.

 

From the same site:

 

"Black House Insider: Exciting, Ulsterman Regrets His White House Insider Lies About Obama"

 

Was reading the initial post above about Jarrett and Daley and just couldn't bring myself to believe the story. Just a little too 'juicy'.

Casino!

 

Military Overrules Obama/Jarret on UBL Operation?

 

Note this part:

 

Point of determination made FOR Obama not BY Obama. Will clarify as details become more clear. Very clear divide between Military and WH. Jarrett marginalized 100% on decision to take out OBL. She played no part. BD worked with LP and HC to form coalition to force CoC to engage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this may have had an earlier part to it. Very interesting.

 

From the same site:

 

"Black House Insider: Exciting, Ulsterman Regrets His White House Insider Lies About Obama"

 

Was reading the initial post above about Jarrett and Daley and just couldn't bring myself to believe the story. Just a little too 'juicy'.

 

 

One person posting under a pseudonym trashing another person posting under a pseudonym, who is "interviewing" an unnamed "operative".

 

Yeah, plenty of credibility all around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

My post above was from BareNakedIslam. [apparently not a respected site here-like WorldNutDaily] It appears to be written or reposted from 'Ulstermans' website. Check out link and it is almost verbatim.

 

NewsFlavor-Ulsterman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted that Link on the Obama thread :lmfao: and I also saw that Save posted it on the Coffee Shop - got a lot a great minds thinking alike ;)

 

Edit:

Sorry-guess I'm just a confused as Jay Carney-it's actually further up on THIS thread :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some day Gates is going to have one heck of a book to write. I firmly believe that the only reason he stayed with this administration is his love for the men and women and uniform and it was his way of not throwing them to the wolves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, at least they didn't say anything about her huge arse..

you know, the one she's married to.

 

 

Three pointer for shoutEvad

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was this the best day for Michelle to be dancing in public: (I don't know how long this video will be on youtube before it gets pulled....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyG6eMptia4

LINK

I am NOT a fan of Michelle Obama, but I have to say I think she looks great there and was being a very good sport and setting a good example for all those kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1714422648
×
×
  • Create New...