WestVirginiaRebel Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Yahoo News:WASHINGTON – The National Labor Relations Board on Friday threatened to sue Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah over constitutional amendments guaranteeing workers the right to a secret ballot in union elections.The agency's acting general counsel, Lafe Solomon, said the amendments conflict with federal law, which gives employers the option of recognizing a union if a majority of workers sign cards that support unionizing.The amendments, approved Nov. 2, have taken effect in South Dakota and Utah, and will do so soon in Arizona and South Carolina.Business and anti-union groups sought the amendments, arguing that such secrecy is necessary to protect workers against union intimidation. They are concerned that Congress might enact legislation requiring employers to allow the "card check" process for forming unions instead of secret ballot elections.In letters to the attorney general of each state, Solomon says the amendments are pre-empted by the supremacy clause of the Constitution because they conflict with employee rights laid out in the National Labor Relations Act. That clause says that when state and federal laws are at odds, federal law prevails.Solomon is asking the attorneys general in South Dakota and Utah for official statements agreeing that their amendments are unconstitutional "to conserve state and federal resources."In his letter to South Carolina's attorney general, Solomon asks the state to take measures that would prevent the Legislature from ratifying the amendment. Solomon requested that Arizona's governor decline to make the amendment official.Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said he believes the state is on solid ground. He plans to coordinate a response with the other three states."If they want to bring a lawsuit, then bring it," Shurtleff said. "We believe that a secret ballot is as fundamental a right as any American has had since the beginning of this country. We want to protect the constitutional rights of our citizens."________Well, at least somebody does... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AceRimmer Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 I'd say Obambi and Holder have crossed the Rubicon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casino67 Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 I can't remember a time when so many states are telling the Feds to shove it. Maybe during the early days of civil rights legislation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_Simmons Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 I can't remember a time when so many states are telling the Feds to shove it. Maybe during the early days of civil rights legislation. Yes, except that this time the racists and gov't-approved bureaucratic terrorists are in Washington DC instead of the other way around... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casino67 Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 I can't remember a time when so many states are telling the Feds to shove it. Maybe during the early days of civil rights legislation. Yes, except that this time the racists and gov't-approved bureaucratic terrorists are in Washington DC instead of the other way around... Correcto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErnstBlofeld Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 John Zogby did a poll in 2004 on unions, and 78 percent of them prefered the secret ballot than "card check". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now