Geee Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 USA Today:WASHINGTON — The companies with multimillion-dollar contracts to supply American airports with body-scanning machines more than doubled their spending on lobbying in the last five years and hired several high-profile former government officials to advance their causes in Washington, records show.L-3 Communications, which has sold $39.7 million worth of the machines to the federal government, spent $4.3 million to influence Congress and federal agencies during the first nine months of this year, up from $2.1 million in 2005, lobbying data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics show. Last year, the company spent $5.5 million on lobbying.Its lobbyists include Linda Daschle, a prominent Democratic figure in Washington, who is a former Federal Aviation Administration official.Rapiscan Systems, meanwhile, has spent $271,500 on lobbying so far this year, compared with $80,000 five years earlier. It has faced criticism for hiring Michael Chertoff, the Homeland Security secretary, who has been a prominent proponent of using scanners to foil terrorism. Officials with Chertoff's firm and Rapiscan say Chertoff was not paid to promote scanner technology. It spent $440,000 on lobbying in 2009.The government has spent $41.2 million so far on Rapiscan's machines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geee Posted November 22, 2010 Author Share Posted November 22, 2010 Naked Body Scanner Manufacturer's CEO Obama's Guest on Trip to India Submitted by yogmama on Thu, 11/18/2010 - 01:15 in Daily Paul Liberty Forum "OSI Systems is the owner of Rapiscan Systems which manufactures the Secure 1000, one of the most commonly used backscatter x-ray machines. And, no it is not the Deepak Chopra you’re thinking of. http://dailypaul.com/node/149723 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geee Posted November 22, 2010 Author Share Posted November 22, 2010 USA Today fails to mention that the Linda Daschle they mention is Tom Daschle's wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 USA Today fails to mention that the Linda Daschle they mention is Tom Daschle's wife. They did, towards the bottom of the article. Daschle, meanwhile, lobbied against Chaffetz's bill on behalf of L-3 Communications. Daschle, the wife of former Senate majority leader Tom Daschle, has represented the company since 1997. Daschle said explosive devices that cannot be detected by traditional X-ray machines represent a real threat to aviation security, and government officials with access to classified information understand that. "I don't think it was Linda Daschle that made the difference" in L-3 Communications' success, she said. "I think it was people understanding what the threat is and seeing these capable solutions." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 While hunting pheasant in eastern Colorado, I became friends with the farmers & land-owners, that frequently told me how they had to "farm the government" in order to survive. Not like the mega-millions recent "black farmer" settlements that Shirley Sherrod took pride in engineering where a group of 1,200 disenfranchised black farmers suddenly bloomed to 16,000.....and most of them having been no closer to farming than a supermarket. The Colorado farmers would receive payments for growing specific crops & for allowing land to lay fallow. Nobody seems to be able to farm government as well as the Daschle's, though. I also read that Senate & Congress members "personal piggy banks" have risen between 12% and 18% from 2008 to 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestVirginiaRebel Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 USA Today:WASHINGTON — The companies with multimillion-dollar contracts to supply American airports with body-scanning machines more than doubled their spending on lobbying in the last five years and hired several high-profile former government officials to advance their causes in Washington, records show.L-3 Communications, which has sold $39.7 million worth of the machines to the federal government, spent $4.3 million to influence Congress and federal agencies during the first nine months of this year, up from $2.1 million in 2005, lobbying data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics show. Last year, the company spent $5.5 million on lobbying.Its lobbyists include Linda Daschle, a prominent Democratic figure in Washington, who is a former Federal Aviation Administration official.Rapiscan Systems, meanwhile, has spent $271,500 on lobbying so far this year, compared with $80,000 five years earlier. It has faced criticism for hiring Michael Chertoff, the former Homeland Security secretary, who has been a prominent proponent of using scanners to foil terrorism. Officials with Chertoff's firm and Rapiscan say Chertoff was not paid to promote scanner technology. It spent $440,000 on lobbying in 2009.The government has spent $41.2 million so far on Rapiscan's machines."This is how business gets done in Washington," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics. "The revolving door provides corporations like these with a short cut to lawmakers" and other decision-makers.________Hey, being rude and intrusive costs money... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 SrWoodChuck "And here is where I'd like to toss SrWoodChuck if I can get my hands on him." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrWoodchuck Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 SrWoodChuck "And here is where I'd like to toss SrWoodChuck if I can get my hands on him." Pepper! If, as you suggest, Shirley is all about me going swimming......I'd have to latch on and introduce her to "swimming with the fishes dolphins!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanguine Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 Isn't this the company that george soros invested in and just got out with a tidy profit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted November 23, 2010 Share Posted November 23, 2010 SrWoodChuck Shirley surely appears to be cogitating some deep thoughts there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geee Posted November 23, 2010 Author Share Posted November 23, 2010 Sanguine. A quick web search shows that Soros had investments with BOTH companies mentioned in this article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanguine Posted November 23, 2010 Share Posted November 23, 2010 Sanguine. A quick web search shows that Soros had investments with BOTH companies mentioned in this article. Wow! What a coincidence! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now