Jump to content

Five myths about Sarah Palin


Casino67

Recommended Posts

AR2010101404794.html?sid=ST2010101404854
Washington Post:

1. Palin cost McCain the 2008 election.

She didn't. CNN's 2008 national exit poll, for example, asked voters whether Palin was a factor when they stepped into the voting booth. Those who said yes broke for McCain 56 percent to 43 percent.

Before Palin's selection, remember, McCain suffered from an enthusiasm gap. Republicans were reluctant to vote for the senator from Arizona because of his reputation as a maverick who'd countered his party on taxes, immigration, drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and "cap and trade" climate legislation. But Palin's conservative record in Alaska and antiabortion advocacy changed the Republican mood. With her by his side, McCain's fundraising and support from conservatives improved. It wasn't enough to beat Barack Obama -- but McCain probably would have lost the presidency by a greater margin if he had, say, selected independent Sen. Joe Lieberman as his running mate, further alienating the GOP base.

snip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Casino67! Great post!

 

........and from WAPO yet! Matthew Continetti must be the token, Conservative's & Weirdo's writer, that got to post because everyone else was ill, or out campaigning for Liberal slugs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Casino67! Great post!

 

........and from WAPO yet! Matthew Continetti must be the token, Conservative's & Weirdo's writer, that got to post because everyone else was ill, or out campaigning for Liberal slugs.

 

The WaPo amazed me as well, that is why I thought it would be a hit piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1715778955
×
×
  • Create New...