The media's war on Clarence and Ginni Thomas

[Valin]

May 7, 2023 #TheDamageReport #JohnIadarola #TheYoungTurks

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' corruption scandals go even deeper as his wife, Ginni Thomas, was exposed for a hidden name paper trail has the worst defense put up by Leonard Leo imaginable. John Iadarola and Brett Erlich break it down on The Damage Report.

[Geee]

This Tweet from Julie Kelly is interesting:

 

 

 

Julie Kelly

@julie_kelly2

 

Btw one group organizing pressure campaign against Clarence Thomas is National Women’s Legal Center.

 

CEO is Fatima Goss Graves—wife of DC US Attorney Matthew Graves. He’s in charge of prosecuting every single January 6 defendant

[Valin]

24 minutes ago, Geee said:

This Tweet from Julie Kelly is interesting:

 

 

 

Julie Kelly

@julie_kelly2

 

Btw one group organizing pressure campaign against Clarence Thomas is National Women’s Legal Center.

 

CEO is Fatima Goss Graves—wife of DC US Attorney Matthew Graves. He’s in charge of prosecuting every single January 6 defendant

Well not really. I'd bet she has also contributed to Environmental Activist groups, Groups promoting DEI, Transgender Rights, WEF, etc etc etc.

As I keep pointing out its all the same ideology/religion, even if the supporters don't realize it.

[Valin]

DU

[Valin]

The Clown News Network

ProPublica report offers broadest look yet at Clarence Thomas’ luxury travel bankrolled by wealthy friends and reveals private jet and helicopter rides and VIP sporting event tickets

 

[Valin]

1 hour ago, Valin said:

The Clown News Network

ProPublica report offers broadest look yet at Clarence Thomas’ luxury travel bankrolled by wealthy friends and reveals private jet and helicopter rides and VIP sporting event tickets

 

 

[Geee]

The Left’s Relentless, Unjustified Assaults on the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy

Left-wing publications such as ProPublica, Slate, and The Guardian have led an orchestrated assault against the high court’s Republican-appointed justices, and their message has been amplified by Senate Democrats.

Their motive? To cause the American people to question the legitimacy of some of the Supreme Court’s majority opinions that the Left does not like.

These publications are intimating, but not actually arguing, that the accused justices’ actions violated then-existing judicial ethics rules—they didn’t. Instead, the media outlets aim to generate skepticism about the justices’ ethics, integrity, and impartiality. 

 

So far, these attacks on the high court’s conservative justices aren’t as dramatic as the demonstrations outside their homes—which have diminished but are still continuing—or as dangerous as the assassination attempt against one, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in early June 2022. But the assaults on the six conservative justices—and by extension, the legitimacy of the entire nine-member court—have been equally fierce.

[Valin]

Over 100 former law clerks defend Clarence Thomas in open letter

In the letter, the clerks wrote that Thomas’ integrity is “unimpeachable” and that he’s never wavered from his independence on the court.
Jaret Stepman
August 30, 2023

(The Daily Signal) — Over 100 former law clerks of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas have written an open letter defending him from accusations of ethics violations.

In the letter, the clerks wrote that Thomas’ integrity is “unimpeachable” and that he’s never wavered from his independence on the court.

The letter recounted Thomas’ life story of being descended from African slaves, raised by his grandfather in segregated Georgia, going to law school, then eventually making his way onto the Supreme Court.

“It is a story that should be told in every American classroom, at every American kitchen table, in every anthology of American dreams realized,” the letter read.

The clerks wrote that despite this, Thomas has been targeted with “political headlines taking aim at his character, his judicial philosophy, his marriage, even his race.”

They said that these attacks are all aimed at undermining the integrity of the Supreme Court:

(Snip)