The Most Important Obamacare Case You’ve Never Heard Of

[Geee]

Human Events:

While the nation eagerly awaits the Supreme Court’s ruling in King v. Burwell, a case brought by an unknown Pennsylvania tax collector has quietly made its way to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and has the potential to end President Barack Obama’s most important piece of legislation, the Affordable Care Act.

 

Like countless others, Jeffrey Cutler, currently the tax collector of East Lampeter Township, Pennsylvania, received a notice from his health insurance company in October 2013 that indicated his plan did not qualify for renewal under the rules established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. Cutler, who had been enrolled in the same plan since 2007, was satisfied with his coverage and did not want to switch to what he considered to be an inferior plan offered through the government-run health insurance exchange.

 

Facing significant political pressure from Republicans and Americans who had lost their insurance plans, Obama announced a “transition policy” in November 2013 that promised to allow individuals to temporarily keep their health insurance plans even if they otherwise would not qualify for renewal under the ACA. However, the transition plan was not applied universally; state governments had the authority to decide whether or not to allow their own citizens to keep their plans.

 

Rules established by Pennsylvania state officials made it possible for Cutler to keep his plan, but only if his insurance company agreed. His insurance company did not, and Cutler lost his insurance on January 1, 2014. He has been without health insurance since.

[JC_]

From page 4 case # 5:19-cv-00834 ECF 101 titled [RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, LLC (ECF 99) FOR WRIT OF EXECUTION AND WHISTLEBLOWER] …The actions involved also involves a conspiracy to hide an ongoing criminal enterprise and other crimes by the democratic party to hinder the president in carrying out his constitutional duties. Nancy Pelosi in her official capacity did violate via her lawyer (Mr Donald B. Verilli Jr.) and stated “[N]o one would be hurt and the greater justice would be attained” and violated (18 USC § 1001) on 03JAN2019 on page 24 of the filing that was
made in case 4:18-cv-00167-0, a significant federal crime on her behalf just after she became speaker of the house. She has also has interfered with the treaty between the United States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998,
and with an Exchange of Notes signed on September 30, 1999, which provides for its provisional application. Katie Hill (a Democrat member of the house from California) was forced to resign from office ....Based on the Katie Hill resignation, Nancy Pelosi must also quit her position. .......Based on a previous incident by United States Representative <ref> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3Rut64GDgA </ref> Mr. Adam Schiff did willfully and with forethought did intentionally violate the Hobbs Act codified as 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (FCPA codified as 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1). Also this case alo involves (18 U.S. Code § 1519 – Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records), (18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments).
Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgCle8F_zUk for more information and read comments sorted newest first. Also see
<ref> https://www.americanfreedomlawcenter.org/case/jeffrey-cutler-v-u-s-dept-of-health-human-services/ </ref> and <ref> https://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work/corman-v-torres </ref><ref> https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27231978/CUTLER_v_PELOSI_et_al </ref>