Geee Posted January 23, 2022 Share Posted January 23, 2022 American Thinker If you’ve been wondering about the extent of voter fraud in America, we may be seeing a staggering amount of either fraud or grotesque negligence in Wisconsin voter rolls. A review of the state’s voter roles showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918. Of that number, 20% of these people, all of whom must be at least 124 years old, voted last November. Biden “won” in Wisconsin by 20,682 votes.... For regular American Thinker readers, this shouldn’t come as a surprise. Roughly two weeks ago, Jay Valentine wrote about the extent of fraud he and his team have discovered as they’ve uploaded voter rolls (which often had corrupted data that seemed deliberately intended to keep information opaque) into Valentine’s system. Once the information for any given state was loaded and sorted, it invariably revealed rather surprising information in both red and blue states. Among other things, in one red state, there were “4,300 people over 100 years old on their rolls. Some were 121. Those were the kids. The really old ones were almost 2,000 years old, and there were a bunch of them – and they voted.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted January 23, 2022 Share Posted January 23, 2022 @Geee I wonder how many of the Only voted for Joe Biden? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDwaters Posted January 23, 2022 Share Posted January 23, 2022 3 hours ago, Geee said: f you’ve been wondering about the extent of voter fraud in America, we may be seeing a staggering amount of either fraud or grotesque negligence in Wisconsin voter rolls. A review of the state’s voter roles showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918. Of that number, 20% of these people, all of whom must be at least 124 years old, voted last November. Biden “won” in Wisconsin by 20,682 votes.... This is probably the only point where I've heard an official explanation that went beyond "shut up, he explained". The supposed reason is that the voting roles were transferred to a new database and the 1918 date was the default; they just never got around to updating that part of the database. Of course, if you believe that, I have this bridge for sale . . . 😉 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MISBAILEY Posted January 23, 2022 Share Posted January 23, 2022 Fraud or neglect neither one is an acceptable answer, you're either a crook or stupid. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now