Jump to content

7 Things We've Learned About the 2020 Elections


Geee

Recommended Posts

7_things_weve_learned_about_the_2020_elections_147022.html
Real Clear Politics

The United States Agency for International Development, which monitors foreign elections to ensure fairness and accuracy, asserts that proper elections require “transparency, inclusiveness, and accountability.”

The 2020 election in the United States, however, remains one of the least transparent, inclusive, and accountable contests in our nation’s history.  And unfortunately, due to prevailing political headwinds, it will likely remain so because election officials are refusing to be held accountable and answer basic, reasonable questions.

:snip:

The Amistad Project is doing its part and has engaged in litigation in several states to bring transparency to unprecedented practices in our last national election. The following are some of our initial findings:

  1. Many key government election offices received more private money than taxpayer money to manage the election.
  2. A majority of that money was spent in a sophisticated effort to turn out the vote of a specific profile of voter in order to benefit one candidate.
  3. These expenditures greatly exceeded campaign finance limits and violated laws and systems designed to keep government neutral in managing elections.
  4. These private interests dictated the manner in which the election would be managed.
  5. Amistad litigation and investigation have revealed that a handful of partisan billionaires funneled funds through a collection of left-leaning nonprofits directly into the counting centers of the urban core of swing states.
  6. Ballots and voters were treated differently based on access to these funds.
  7. A series of lawsuits by the left — and executive branch use of “emergency police powers” due to COVID-19 — radically changed the management of the 2020 election, resulting in different treatment of ballots and voters within several states.:snip:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democrats Mislead Americans on Election Reform

Amid plummeting poll numbers, rising inflation and a Supreme Court smackdown, President Biden traveled to the Peach State earlier this week not to celebrate the University of Georgia’s national championship the night before, but to foretell the doom of Americans’ right to vote. According to Biden and leading Democrats Chuck Schumer and Stacey Abrams, the only way to save America is to pass their party's sweeping election reform legislation, the so-called Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Sounds simple, doesn’t it? What American could oppose bills with names like that?

As usual, upon closer inspection we find that Democrats are far out of touch with Americans. Biden and fellow Democrats have spent his first year in office drumming up asinine fears that huge swaths of Americans are losing the right to vote. In reality, Democrats are doing this to distract from the fact that their election reforms instead do the opposite of what Americans support. Democrats’ election reforms would do away with photo ID requirements, prevent the cleaning of voter rolls, and facilitate ballot trafficking.:snip:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Escalating Nationwide Battle Over Private Millions to Bankroll Public Elections

:snip:

    • So far at least 10 GOP-controlled states have passed laws to prohibit or limit the use of private money in public elections. These include the swing states of Arizona, Florida, Georgia, and Ohio.
    • During 2020, nonprofits donated more than $400 million to this purpose. Most of the funding, around $350 million, came from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, distributed primarily through the Center for Tech and Civic Life.
    • Democrats and others contend such money is necessary to support the work of underfunded election boards facing the added challenges of the pandemic.
    • Republicans say the private grants were disproportionately allocated to counties eventually won by Biden.
    • With federal election funding distributed primarily based on population, most money tends to flow to logistically challenged cities and larger counties — often Democrat-run.
    • In the case of 2020’s outsized private grants, however, the transparency laws governing federal spending didn't apply.
    • Congresswoman Claudia Tenney (R-N.Y.): “Our elections should never be for sale, but they were in 2020.” 
    • Meanwhile, the progressive Brennan Center for Justice says 25 states have enacted 62 new laws that make it easier to vote.:snip:
    • 566162_5_.png.2a5c1ea14f7ce3b42629838163a48384.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1714045890
×
×
  • Create New...