Geee Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 Just the News Washington state officials claim its no-exception abortion coverage mandate in health plans does not necessarily require health plans to include abortion coverage This baffled a federal appeals judge at oral argument Friday, characterizing officials as saying "our fingerprints aren't on the murder weapon." Seattle-area Cedar Park Assembly of God is challenging SB 6219, which requires health plans that cover maternity care to also provide "substantially equivalent coverage to permit the abortion of a pregnancy." It took effect with health plans issued or renewed after Jan. 1, 2019. The law goes further than the federal Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate, offering no religious or moral exemptions even for churches that believe abortion is murder. The Supreme Court upheld religious and moral exemptions for religious nonprofits under the ACA last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 1 hour ago, Geee said: Just the News Washington state officials claim its no-exception abortion coverage mandate in health plans does not necessarily require health plans to include abortion coverage Seattle-area Cedar Park Assembly of God is challenging SB 6219, which requires health plans that cover maternity care to also provide "substantially equivalent coverage to permit the abortion of a pregnancy." It took effect with health plans issued or renewed after Jan. 1, 2019. The judge is not the only one more than a little baffled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now