You want to know why she’s called Bruno?

[Geee]

American Spectator:

You want to know why she’s called Bruno?

Washington

 

Through the years one of my favorite sallies against the Clintons has been to refer to Mrs. Clinton as “Bruno.” At times readers have asked, “Why do you call her Bruno?” It is because there has always been an atmosphere of thuggishness about her. Another way of putting it is that time and again she acts as though the rule of law does not pertain to her. For instance, on the matter of the many women who have willingly or unwillingly been pulled into her husband’s lubricious ambit. How many times have you read or heard a quote attributed to her where she vows to “crush” a woman whom Bill rutted with or to “crucify” her. One even reads such quotes in the Mainstream Media (MSM). Yet she is portrayed as a champion of women.

 

Just last week I read quotes full of menace from Hillary in the Washington Post and this week in the venerable New York Times. Were similar quotes ever attributed to Nancy Reagan or to any other First Lady? But then none of those First Ladies was married to Bill.

 

Now, of course, today the matronly Hillary is long past her prime as a plausible Bruno. As she breaks out in coughing spells, and has to be propped up at the lectern in her heavily cushioned pantsuits, it is easy for us to have forgotten the intimidating specter she struck for such woman as Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, the young Monica, or even Juanita Broaddrick who allegedly was raped my smiling Bill. Yet in decades past she was a highly volatile figure and in fact posed a threat to White House personnel. There are all those witnesses who have reported seeing her bean her husband or members of the Secret Service with a book or a lamp. I think even the loyal George Stephanopoulos reported her aggression.