Violence Against Women?

[Draggingtree]

RedState:

Violence Against Women?

By: Daniel Horowitz (Diary) | February 5th, 2013 at 08:02 AM

Liberals have always held a bifurcated view of women and their need for government protection. On the one hand, they seek to use the boot of government to obliterate every last inherent difference between the genders, even in the most physical manifestations. On the other hand, they use big government programs to grant superfluous rights to women, as if they needed government to protect them from men.

 

This week, the Senate will debate reauthorization of the misleadingly named Violence Against Women Act (S.47). All but 14 Republicans agreed to proceed with debate on the bill. What is this ridiculous bill nicknamed VAWA?

[Valin]

RedState:

Violence Against Women?

By: Daniel Horowitz (Diary) | February 5th, 2013 at 08:02 AM

Liberals have always held a bifurcated view of women and their need for government protection. On the one hand, they seek to use the boot of government to obliterate every last inherent difference between the genders, even in the most physical manifestations. On the other hand, they use big government programs to grant superfluous rights to women, as if they needed government to protect them from men.

 

 

Just ran across this, in my wanderings

 

DOUBLE STANDARDS – Disproportionate violence and false equivalence