Geee Posted November 15, 2010 Share Posted November 15, 2010 Washington Examiner:11/15/10 11:35 AM ESTRep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., requested a delay in his ethics hearing on the grounds that he lacked counsel. His request was denied.The members of the Ethics subcommittee holding the hearing now appear to be considering whether they can grant the equivalent of “summary judgment” against Rangel. The committee has a set of uncontested facts — regarding Rangel’s rent-controlled apartments and his failure to report income to the IRS — which establish that Rangel violated ethics rules. From these, Ethics committee counsel Blake Chisam said, the panel should be able to determine whether he violated House rules without any further hearings or testimony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted November 15, 2010 Share Posted November 15, 2010 More here House ethics trial opens for NY's Charles Rangel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted November 15, 2010 Share Posted November 15, 2010 Valin Geee A two-fer! The old proverb: A man who is his own lawyer has a fool for his client. And a corollary: A lawyer who has Rangel for his client is a fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted November 15, 2010 Share Posted November 15, 2010 Valin Geee A two-fer! The old proverb: A man who is his own lawyer has a fool for his client. And a corollary: A lawyer who has Rangel for his client is a fool. So that means...Fool squared? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted November 15, 2010 Share Posted November 15, 2010 So that means...Fool squared? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now