ErnstBlofeld Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 The Telegraph:Under the plans, the number of warships would be cut by almost half to just 25, with frigates, destroyers, submarines, minesweepers and all amphibious craft scrapped. Even if built, the new carriers could sail without any British aircraft to fly from them after admirals "mortgaged everything" to persuade ministers not to abandon the £5.2 billion programme. The ships could also be delayed for years and redesigned to save money, defence sources have disclosed. RAF chief predicts controversial takeover of Royal Naval air powerIn a final appeal to the National Security Council, Navy chiefs yesterday offered to make cuts that would reduce the senior service to its smallest since the time of Henry VIII. One new aircraft carrier is already under construction, but the fate of the second has emerged as the central issue of the Government's Strategic Defence and Security Review, which is supposed to frame military planning for the next decade. With less than two weeks until the review is due to report, government spokesmen last night insisted that "no decisions have been taken" on the second carrier. A meeting of senior Cabinet members yesterday stopped short of a formal decision on the carrier order, although insiders now believe both ships will be built. However, the timetable and the specification for the carriers remain in the balance. Options still on the table include delaying delivery by several years and redesigning one or both ships to carry cheaper jets or even helicopters. Alternatively, the second carrier could be built but put on "extended readiness", effectively mothballed as soon as it was completed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clearvision Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 (Yeah, but what has having a large navy every done for the British?)sarcasm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErnstBlofeld Posted October 8, 2010 Author Share Posted October 8, 2010 These carriers were supposed to carry 40-50 F-35s each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now