Geee Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 Big Journalism:Pasadena Star-News Outs Anonymous Breitbart Videographer Who Exposed Boxer Campaign AstroturfingPosted by Derek Broes Oct 1st 2010 at 3:49 pm iIn response to a video showing day laborers being hired to hold campaign signs for Barbara Boxer, the Pasadena Star-News published a story about the video that has been a “viral phenomenon” according to the story written by staff writers Brian Charles and Frank C. Girardot. The video shows day laborers holding signs for the Boxer campaign during a rally outside of the location where Carly Fiorina showed up to debate Boxer, who was joining via satellite from Washington, D.C., where she was to vote on the very important bill to limit the volume on our TV commercials. The video was taken using a hidden camera and captures the day laborers holding signs for the campaign and when questioned about the sign they responded with “I don’t speak English.” When questioned further about who made the sign, one man referred to the lady “that pays” along with some other broken English that was not audible.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbVI7XgGBnQ&feature=player_embedded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollyannaish Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 Bwahahahaha! That's pretty funny. What a great video! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 I'll have to watch it later so I don't burn the lasagna. Please tell me that is not for real? where she was to vote on the very important bill to limit the volume on our TV commercials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollyannaish Posted October 1, 2010 Share Posted October 1, 2010 I'll have to watch it later so I don't burn the lasagna. Please tell me that is not for real? where she was to vote on the very important bill to limit the volume on our TV commercials. Well, it's kind of right. To limit the volume OF tv commercials. You know, fewer of them. (Don't get my started on it this. Commercials have added great things to our society. 1. Without commercials it the DVR would never have been invented. 2. Commercials are usually more creative than the program they are in. 3. Without commercials I would have never bought the pediegg, which came in really handy yesterday when I needed something to sand the edges of sheetrock.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Well, it's kind of right. To limit the volume OF tv commercials. You know, fewer of them. (Don't get my started on it this. Commercials have added great things to our society. 1. Without commercials it the DVR would never have been invented. 2. Commercials are usually more creative than the program they are in. 3. Without commercials I would have never bought the pediegg, which came in really handy yesterday when I needed something to sand the edges of sheetrock.) So, fewer advertisers is their goal? So they can bail out television stations down the road? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 I'll have to watch it later so I don't burn the lasagna. Please tell me that is not for real? where she was to vote on the very important bill to limit the volume on our TV commercials. Doing the vital business of the Republic! I do wonder what John Adams would say. Given his attitude toward fools, nothing good I image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollyannaish Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Well, it's kind of right. To limit the volume OF tv commercials. You know, fewer of them. (Don't get my started on it this. Commercials have added great things to our society. 1. Without commercials it the DVR would never have been invented. 2. Commercials are usually more creative than the program they are in. 3. Without commercials I would have never bought the pediegg, which came in really handy yesterday when I needed something to sand the edges of sheetrock.) So, fewer advertisers is their goal? So they can bail out television stations down the road? Bwahahahaha! I just looked this up. It IS how loud they can be, not how many. OMG. These people deserve Stephen Colbert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Bwahahahaha! I just looked this up. It IS how loud they can be, not how many. OMG. These people deserve Stephen Colbert. Wow. I guess it is for all the people that don't have remotes. Insanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AceRimmer Posted October 2, 2010 Share Posted October 2, 2010 Bwahahahaha! I just looked this up. It IS how loud they can be, not how many. OMG. These people deserve Stephen Colbert. Wow. I guess it is for all the people that don't have remotes. Insanity. One guy on another site I frequent said he had a TV with no volume control. I asked him if he'd gotten it off the back of a truck in the local Chinatown. Controlling the volume of commercials on TV is DEFINITELY more important than showing up for a debate with Fiorina! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now