California Judge Vaughn Walker Hands Victory to Proposition 8 Opponents |

[Geee]

Daily Caller:



Joni Boettcher, left, kisses her roommate Tika Shenghur during a protest march down Santa Monica Boulevard in West Hollywood , Calif., Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2008. before the start of a``No on Prop 8'' rally. In a heartbreaking defeat for the gay-rights movement, California voters put a stop to gay marriage, creating uncertainty about the legal status of 18,000 same-sex couples who tied the knot during a four-month window of opportunity opened by the state's highest court. (AP Photo/Kevork Djansezian) Original Filename: Gay_Marriage_KSD106.jpg
A federal judge in California is expected to issue his ruling Wednesday on whether the state’s voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.

The closely-watched case, to be decided by Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, comes some two years after Californians voted to pass Proposition 8, which defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

Wednesday’s ruling, expected in the early afternoon, will decide whether that ban violates the U.S. Constitution by creating separate classes of people with different laws for each.

Full story: Judge Vaughn Walker Hands Victory to Proposition 8 Opponents — CNN

[Sabre86]

No surprise, an openly homosexual judge tries to institute queer marriage bu judicial fiat.

 

Oh, and Ted Olson, there is a special place in hell waiting for you.

[Argyle58]

To his credit, Judge Walker did stay his own decision, allowing an appeal without enactment.

 

Having said that, it was a bad decision which will be overturned at SCOTUS. (Decision has to go through the 9th Circus before that)

[Sabre86]

To his credit, Judge Walker did stay his own decision, allowing an appeal without enactment.

 

Having said that, it was a bad decision which will be overturned at SCOTUS. (Decision has to go through the 9th Circus before that)

 

The stay is for 2 days.

 

SCOTUS will uphold the ruling 5-4, Kennedy always votes with the homos.

 

The scariest thing is the part of the ruling which says that vote and will of the people is "irreverent."