Jump to content

How Fannie Mae Chief Got the Patent for Cap and Trade in 2006


Geee

Recommended Posts

insider-patenting-how-fannie-mae-chief-got-the-patent-for-cap-and-trade-in-2006
Big Government:

Insider Patenting: How Fannie Mae Chief Got the Patent for Cap and Trade in 2006
by John Bambenek

Just one day after the Democrats seized control of Congress, the Chief Executive of Fannie Mae, Franklin Raines, received the patent for a residential cap-and-trade system (Patent 6904336), What this means is that Raines, along with several colleagues who also “own” the patent, could stand to make huge amounts of money if the cap-and-trade regime was ever brought to the residential marketplace. What does this have to do with Fannie Mae? Absolutely nothing.

To understand the implications, a little discussion about patenting is needed. Patents are basically “ownership” rights to an invention. If you invent something, you can license it to others to produce and collect royalties. Each year, thousands of patents are sent to the US Patent Office for consideration. Many “patent houses” simply put in very general patents so they can turn around and sue businesses later for “stealing” their inventions. Sometimes it’s legit, many times its bogus.
As examples, Amazon holds the patent of “one-click purchasing”. Litigation ensued on that. There’s a patent on a “self-executing webpage” which is the reason why a few years ago Microsoft had to convert Internet Explorer to not automatically play media as soon as someone visited a webpage. (i.e. why you have to click a YouTube video for it to play).

Here is where things get interesting. Cap-and-trade legislation literally creates an asset out of thin air. It requires some means to “value” the asset and some means to trade it. In essence, it would lead to government created assets and trading mechanisms. However, when this patent was awarded and applied for, cap-and-trade was not even on the public radar yet.
It is important to remember a few things. Franklin Raines has privileged access to Congress and politicians. He knew and could talk to them about what they were thinking and what they planned to do. As head of a government corporation, he also had a degree of access to the Patent Office to help “smooth the way” to get a patent.

What happened here has all the marks of “insider patenting”. While technically legal, Raines was able to use inside information to put a patent into place before government action created a new marketplace that would require the creation of this systems. The result would have been huge amounts of cash to him and his “co-inventors” and likely, a few patrons on Capitol Hill as well.

This is also likely the first (and probably not the last) case of apparent insider patenting. As big government grows more and more into industry, insiders like Raines will be able to use advanced knowledge of legislative actions to put himself out in front with patenting and ensure he will make piles of cash. What this shows is that the only innovation big government breeds is innovation in new ways for unethical self-enrichment.
_________________________________________________________
Why Oh Why is this man not in jail????????????????
Link to comment
Share on other sites

clearvision

Something strange. Patents are pretty much owned by the employer of the person who invents (unless they are self employed). I can't believe the US Government does not retain rights to any patents on its employees as in the private sector. So I would think Fannie May owns the patent, not Raines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something strange. Patents are pretty much owned by the employer of the person who invents (unless they are self employed). I can't believe the US Government does not retain rights to any patents on its employees as in the private sector. So I would think Fannie May owns the patent, not Raines.

 

No, I don't think so. I think the only way that Fannie Mae would own the patent is if it were a product of a project at Fannie Mae. I think the implication is that he and his buddies, acting on inside information, developed a patent outside of his work at Fannie Mae.

 

But, I'm not a patent attorney and didn't sleep at a Holiday Inn last night, so take that for what it's worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1711648843
×
×
  • Create New...