Jump to content

Does Johns Hopkins hate whites?


Valin

Recommended Posts

Ringside At The Reckoning Substack

Paul Mirengoff
Sep 6, 2023

A few months ago, I was surprised to learn that white representation in the student body of Princeton is down to about 35 percent and that white representation among undergraduates at Stanford is down to 26 percent. Now, I learn from the Washington Post that at Johns Hopkins, whites made up only 17 percent of last year’s freshman class. A decade earlier, white representation was 46 percent.

It turns out that all the talk about creating a campus that “looks like America” was BS, just as we suspected all along. The real goal seems to have been to “screw Whitey.”

How did Johns Hopkins suppress the white presence on campus so dramatically? According to the Hopkins party line, as reported by the Post, three steps made the difference: “the elimination of preferences in admission for children, grandchildren and siblings of alumni; a massive increase in financial aid for families in need; and more extensive recruiting in places where the university is not well known.”

This is a lie. The main reason why Hopkins has been able to replace white students with blacks and Hispanics is its use of different admissions standards for members of different races and ethnicities — in other words, racial discrimination.

The Post never mentions this reality, choosing to accept uncritically Hopkins’ lie. But the central role of racial discrimination is evident from the fact, reported by the Post, that Hopkins believes the Supreme Court’s decision in the Harvard case jeopardizes its diversity regime because of the decision’s impact on colleges’ ability to make race-conscious admission decisions.

(Snip)

It should be obvious that Hopkins will not be able to keep suppressing its white population and maintaining anything like its current level of blacks and Hispanics unless it discriminates against whites and in favor of blacks and Hispanics.

To me, the real question is why Hopkins wants to suppress white representation so severely. It’s difficult to escape the conclusion that Hopkins has it in for whites. And given the degree to which Critical Race Theory, talk of “white privilege,” and critiques of “whiteness” hold sway in academia, we shouldn’t be surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1731454053
×
×
  • Create New...