Kavanaugh accuser to testify Thursday even though all her eyewitnesses dispute her storyE

[Draggingtree]

Legal Insurrection

Kavanaugh accuser to testify Thursday even though all her eyewitnesses dispute her story

 

Posted by William A. Jacobson    Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 10:00am

All four of the people Christine Blasey Ford says were at the party in question deny being there, including a female Democrat.

Two big developments overnight may be the most significant developments so far in the story told by Christine Blasey Ford about Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh:

FIRST. A woman Ford alleged was at the party in question, Leland Keyser, went on record through her attorney denying being at any such Party or knowing Brett Kavanaugh in high school. That mean all four people Ford alleged were at the party in addition to herself have denied Ford’s story. We covered the details in a late update to yesterday’s post.

The Weekly Standard has a report:

Christine Blasey Ford has claimed that four other people attended a small gathering at which she was allegedly assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh. Three of those people, PJ Smyth, Mark Judge, and Kavanaugh, have already denied any recollection of attending such a party.

On Saturday night, Leland Ingham Keyser, a classmate of Ford’s at the all-girls school Holton-Arms and her final named witness, denied any recollection of attending a party with Brett Kavanaugh.             

[Draggingtree]

Kavanaugh Accusations: What Does This Mean Moving Forward

September 23, 2018

0 COMMENTS

Hosted by Bill Bennett

With guest Conrad Black

https://ricochet.com/podcast/bill-bennett-show/kavanaugh-accusations-what-does-this-mean-moving-forward/

 

[Draggingtree]

Surprising, Overlooked Detail About the Five Witnesses in the Kavanaugh Matter

 

There are five named witnesses. Here's what they've told the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Erick Erickson

Editor18 hrs

 

[Draggingtree]

Fourth Supposed Witness To Kavanaugh Accuser’s Alleged Assault Indicates It Didn’t Happen

SEPTEMBER 23, 2018 By Margot Cleveland

Not only do all four people she’s named as witnesses say Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations are completely false, they all say Brett Kavanaugh would never have done such a thing.                       

[Draggingtree]

Democrats have abandoned the presumption of innocence

By Rich Lowry / September 20, 2018 

Christine Blasey Ford deserves a hearing, although at the moment she doesn’t seem to want one. What she doesn’t deserve is to be believed automatically because she’s a woman making an accusation.

When our system of justice is at its best, it judges each individual — the accuser and the accused — fairly, on the basis of the evidence, and with an adversarial process that has proved over the centuries the best way to ascertain the truth.

Ford’s charge is serious by any standard, and despite the shameful way it was handled — Dianne Feinstein sat on it for weeks, until it leaked out at the 11th hour — Republicans appropriately agreed to delay a committee vote and hear from both Ford and Kavanaugh at an open hearing.           https://nypost.com/2018/09/20/democrats-have-abandoned-the-presumption-of-innocence/

[Draggingtree]

CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS

Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyer Exposes Client’s Achilles Heel

California psychologist has an issue with certain key details as negotiations with the Senate Judiciary Committee continue

By Mark Tapscott | Sunday, September 23, 2018

Christine Blasey Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz (shown above left; Ford is at far right), just handed her what looks like an insurmountable credibility problem.

Ford claims Judge Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when both were high schoolers at a suburban Maryland party. She cannot recall the place or date, however, and appears to remember other key details such as who was present incorrectly.

Kavanaugh described Ford’s claim as a “completely and totally false allegation,” and insisted that he has “never done anything like what the accuser describes to her or to anyone.”                 https://www.lifezette.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-accusers-lawyer-exposes-clients-achilles-heel/?utm_source=right-rail-trending    

[Draggingtree]

SEX: DEMOCRATS' MODUS OPERANDI

By Valerie Sobel —— Bio and Archives--September 22, 2018

It finally dawned on me: they DO have a platform. They do have an idea, albeit a solitary one.

Every time we turn around the democrats are obsessing over sex. First it was the misogynist Trump, after they dug up his private conversation with a friend and began their fixation with his mention of the “p” word. That spurred on the creation of vagina-women army, marching outfitted in the most explicit gigantic depictions of female sex organs on their heads and bodies. Hundreds of thousands of women decided to degrade themselves with public displays of “feminist” (I cringe when I hear them use that word) sexuality while carrying the most sexually profane posters.

Then we have the Stormy storm. This was going to be their Watergate of sex stories. Stormy the porn-star, the pole-dancer, the stripper - became their hero, their hope for a better future without Trump. So much so that the porn star was awarded keys to the city of West Hollywood! For all those unique contributions to humanity, of course.

And now we have the Dr. Ford manufactured fiasco. Sex again…Or in this case, almost sex. But that’s good enough for the Dems. They’ll take whatever sex they can get, even if it is only the illusion of sex with underage teenagers.               https://canadafreepress.com/article/sex-democrats-modus-operandi