E-Verify Threatens Us All

[Draggingtree]

Mises Institute

E-Verify Threatens Us All

1 HOUR AGO Ron Paul

In addition to funding for a border wall and other border security measures, immigration hardliners are sure to push to include mandatory E-Verify in any immigration legislation considered by Congress. E-Verify is a (currently) voluntary program where businesses check job applicants’ Social Security numbers and other Information — potentially including “biometric” identifiers like fingerprints — against information stored in a federal database to determine if the job applicants are legally in the United States.

Imagine how much time would be diverted from serving consumers and growing the economy if every US business had to comply with E-Verify. Also, collecting the relevant information and operating the mandatory E-Verify system will prove costly to taxpayers.

Millions of Americans could be denied jobs because E-Verify mistakenly identifies them as illegal immigrants. These Americans would be forced to go through a costly and time-consuming process to force the government to correct its mistake. It is doubtful employers could afford to keep jobs open while potential hires went through this process   

[Valin]

Draggingtree

 

I missed the part where Ron presented a solution.

Ron, 3 small simple questions.

1. What Do You Want?

2. How Do You Get It?

3. Then What Happens?

[Draggingtree]

7 minutes ago, Valin said:

Draggingtree

 

I missed the part where Ron presented a solution.

Ron, 3 small simple questions.

1. What Do You Want?

2. How Do You Get It?

3. Then What Happens?

 

The Paul’s are good people but seem to see Conspiracy ever where

[Valin]

Just now, Draggingtree said:

 

The Paul’s are good people but seem to see Conspiracy ever where

 

Are they?

[Draggingtree]

1 minute ago, Valin said:

 

Are they?

now that's a silly and rather  question 

[Valin]

Just now, Draggingtree said:

now that's a silly and rather  question 

 

I'm thinking (always a dangerous thing ) we must have a different definition of Good People. What have they actually accomplished (politically), other than keep their name in the news? Talking in particularly of Ron....the problem with Rand is he has a tendency to go off into Ronville....ie Libertarian nuttery.