Jump to content

No, Not Trump, Not Ever


Draggingtree

Recommended Posts

SrWoodchuck

We should all just do what a lot of Republicans did in 2012. Since the Republican candidates say and do things we don't like, (like Romney/Ryan did/didn't do)...let's just not vote for anyone...that'll show 'em! They don't deserve our vote, so, until they can put forward someone exactly perfect...we're going to withhold our vote!

 

Killary for President!

 

It just gets sillier & stupider as the nomination goes on. We're mad because the RNC wants people they can control & make money from.

 

Outside interests (SOROS) finance idiots that will do the same (so he can control them & make money on America's decline/destruction.

 

Progressives & Socialists haven't reached the end stage of America's "Change" to Eurostan.

 

Trump is mad & might go 3rd party any minute...splitting the vote for Killary's election.

 

Loretta Lynch worked for a law partnership that represents the Clintons....so "the fix" is already being mailed in.

 

The Democratic nomination is Kabuki theater...between Un-indicted Killary Oblunder Term 3...and a Socialist critter that may not be far enough left to suit everybody all the way on that edge. Either way...the 2nd Amendment is on the way out & the 1st is already under attack by ALGOREMANBEARPIG and every Demoncrap State Attorney General...for saying weather is weather & not the crisis of our lifetime.

 

Cruz has 8 girlfriends & can't help his wife Heidi...who is unstable & has an arrest record.

 

John Kasich thinks he is the 2nd coming of our Savior & Soros is helping him split the Republicans.

 

The RNC is counting on a brokered convention where...wait for it...anything can happen, including nominating someone completely different and very compliant...maybe Boehner/McConnell/Ryan...over what started with 14 people vying for the nomination.

 

Well, my declining years will actually be really declining...since Republican's can't get together on anything...so the completely moronic, lethally insane & morally bankrupt can again lead AMERIKA into the bleak future of crony communism in a classless (in every sense) society of PC droolers & reparation mad ethnic, religious, sexual & political animals...yearning to be unfree...but compensated for just breathing!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

Just heard a scary idea today.... Clinton picks Kasich for VP.

 

Yessss! Now I can complete my self-destruction by voting for two, instead of one morally & ethically bankrupt idiot clowns!

 

Speed the Apocalypse! Elect the 13th Imam! Sound the bugle, Gabriel!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How to Dump Trump

 

“Sir, with all due respect, that’s the argument of a five year old,” Anderson Cooper told Donald Trump the other day. That’s an insult to kindergarteners. The tykes in Mrs. Cummings’ morning class have more self-discipline than the Republican frontrunner. Not to mention better manners.

 

Cooper prefaced his jibe with a show of deference that Trump did not deserve. It’s called reciprocity: If you want someone to call you sir, to show you respect, then do the same. Trump never has. He demeans women on the basis of their appearance, he mocks the disabled, he lies with unsettling ease, he flips the bird at mores and traditions and institutions, he has become the paladin of misogynists and bigots and everyone looking to blame scapegoats for whatever confusion and unhappiness and resentment is in their lives.

 

No longer is Donald Trump a trifle, a fillip, an entertainment, the personification of the liberal caricature of Republicans, easy to mock, easier to dismiss, a phenomenon at which to awe, an avenger of the people who has the right enemies. He’s a threat to American democracy. And he must be stopped.

 

I don’t say this lightly. I’m as critical of our elites as the next talk radio host. Their uncritical attitude toward globalization would embarrass Dr. Pangloss. Immigration, trade, and internationalism have costs. But these costs must be weighed against the benefits, and then ameliorated prudently, gradually, and steadfastly. Trump would have us believe our troubles will vanish as soon as we build his wall, raise tariffs, and exit NATO. It’s a fantasy.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://freebeacon.com/columns/how-to-dump-trump/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9/11: What Would Trump Do?

 

It’s the totally unthinkable question that Americans find themselves confronting this week: What would President Donald Trump do in a genuine national crisis?

 

After a series of overseas terror attacks and some startling statements about nuclear weapons and torture, the world’s attention has turned to Trump’s foreign policy—an area where he has few advisers, no experience and a tendency to fire off answers and deal with the fallout later. The reality of a Trump candidacy has begun to set in: If Trump is elected and a major national crisis hits, he’ll be the one with his hands on the button. He’ll be at the head of the table in the Situation Room. His decisions would steer America’s immediate response and could set the course of American policy for years.

 

What’s hard to project with a normal politician is nearly impossible to guess with Trump. He has no foreign policy or public service experience, which means there’s no official record to consult, and his public statements, while extreme, have been vague. The saber-rattling statements that excite his supporters also suggest he has disregard for linchpins of the global order like NATO, the Geneva Conventions and the hard-won global nuclear-weapons limits.

Politico Magazine asked foreign policy and counterterrorism experts, historians, Trump biographers, even psychologists to take a serious guess at how he’d handle the days after a terrorist attack in the United States—all based on what they know about Trump the candidate and what he’ll be facing if he gets elected.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-terrorist-attack-foreign-policy-213784

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

9/11: What Would Trump Do?

 

It’s the totally unthinkable question that Americans find themselves confronting this week: What would President Donald Trump do in a genuine national crisis?

 

After a series of overseas terror attacks and some startling statements about nuclear weapons and torture, the world’s attention has turned to Trump’s foreign policy—an area where he has few advisers, no experience and a tendency to fire off answers and deal with the fallout later. The reality of a Trump candidacy has begun to set in: If Trump is elected and a major national crisis hits, he’ll be the one with his hands on the button. He’ll be at the head of the table in the Situation Room. His decisions would steer America’s immediate response and could set the course of American policy for years.

 

What’s hard to project with a normal politician is nearly impossible to guess with Trump. He has no foreign policy or public service experience, which means there’s no official record to consult, and his public statements, while extreme, have been vague. The saber-rattling statements that excite his supporters also suggest he has disregard for linchpins of the global order like NATO, the Geneva Conventions and the hard-won global nuclear-weapons limits.

Politico Magazine asked foreign policy and counterterrorism experts, historians, Trump biographers, even psychologists to take a serious guess at how he’d handle the days after a terrorist attack in the United States—all based on what they know about Trump the candidate and what he’ll be facing if he gets elected.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-terrorist-attack-foreign-policy-213784

 

I can say with confidence that Trump would be a "Yuge" improvement over the Jarrett/Skippy administration. Oblunder could honestly be called "Wrong Way Jones"...as he uniformly does the worst thing possible. By contrast, "the Donald" would get things right about the same as a blind squirrel finding an acorn or a broken clock being right twice a day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

9/11: What Would Trump Do?

 

It’s the totally unthinkable question that Americans find themselves confronting this week: What would President Donald Trump do in a genuine national crisis?

 

After a series of overseas terror attacks and some startling statements about nuclear weapons and torture, the world’s attention has turned to Trump’s foreign policy—an area where he has few advisers, no experience and a tendency to fire off answers and deal with the fallout later. The reality of a Trump candidacy has begun to set in: If Trump is elected and a major national crisis hits, he’ll be the one with his hands on the button. He’ll be at the head of the table in the Situation Room. His decisions would steer America’s immediate response and could set the course of American policy for years.

 

What’s hard to project with a normal politician is nearly impossible to guess with Trump. He has no foreign policy or public service experience, which means there’s no official record to consult, and his public statements, while extreme, have been vague. The saber-rattling statements that excite his supporters also suggest he has disregard for linchpins of the global order like NATO, the Geneva Conventions and the hard-won global nuclear-weapons limits.

Politico Magazine asked foreign policy and counterterrorism experts, historians, Trump biographers, even psychologists to take a serious guess at how he’d handle the days after a terrorist attack in the United States—all based on what they know about Trump the candidate and what he’ll be facing if he gets elected.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-terrorist-attack-foreign-policy-213784

 

I can say with confidence that Trump would be a "Yuge" improvement over the Jarrett/Skippy administration. Oblunder could honestly be called "Wrong Way Jones"...as he uniformly does the worst thing possible. By contrast, "the Donald" would get things right about the same as a blind squirrel finding an acorn or a broken clock being right twice a day.

 

 

I couldn't say the "with confidence". I could only hope and pray, but I wouldn't have confidence. The devil you know and the devil you don't know could be equal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

 

 

9/11: What Would Trump Do?

 

It’s the totally unthinkable question that Americans find themselves confronting this week: What would President Donald Trump do in a genuine national crisis?

 

After a series of overseas terror attacks and some startling statements about nuclear weapons and torture, the world’s attention has turned to Trump’s foreign policy—an area where he has few advisers, no experience and a tendency to fire off answers and deal with the fallout later. The reality of a Trump candidacy has begun to set in: If Trump is elected and a major national crisis hits, he’ll be the one with his hands on the button. He’ll be at the head of the table in the Situation Room. His decisions would steer America’s immediate response and could set the course of American policy for years.

 

What’s hard to project with a normal politician is nearly impossible to guess with Trump. He has no foreign policy or public service experience, which means there’s no official record to consult, and his public statements, while extreme, have been vague. The saber-rattling statements that excite his supporters also suggest he has disregard for linchpins of the global order like NATO, the Geneva Conventions and the hard-won global nuclear-weapons limits.

Politico Magazine asked foreign policy and counterterrorism experts, historians, Trump biographers, even psychologists to take a serious guess at how he’d handle the days after a terrorist attack in the United States—all based on what they know about Trump the candidate and what he’ll be facing if he gets elected.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-terrorist-attack-foreign-policy-213784

 

I can say with confidence that Trump would be a "Yuge" improvement over the Jarrett/Skippy administration. Oblunder could honestly be called "Wrong Way Jones"...as he uniformly does the worst thing possible. By contrast, "the Donald" would get things right about the same as a blind squirrel finding an acorn or a broken clock being right twice a day.

 

 

I couldn't say the "with confidence". I could only hope and pray, but I wouldn't have confidence. The devil you know and the devil you don't know could be equal.

 

 

Sweet @Geee! I do know the devil I know, you know? No way, the devil I don't know, is as bad as the devil I know. I know, no one can know the devil you don't know until you know, you know? Just say know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

9/11: What Would Trump Do?

 

It’s the totally unthinkable question that Americans find themselves confronting this week: What would President Donald Trump do in a genuine national crisis?

 

After a series of overseas terror attacks and some startling statements about nuclear weapons and torture, the world’s attention has turned to Trump’s foreign policy—an area where he has few advisers, no experience and a tendency to fire off answers and deal with the fallout later. The reality of a Trump candidacy has begun to set in: If Trump is elected and a major national crisis hits, he’ll be the one with his hands on the button. He’ll be at the head of the table in the Situation Room. His decisions would steer America’s immediate response and could set the course of American policy for years.

 

What’s hard to project with a normal politician is nearly impossible to guess with Trump. He has no foreign policy or public service experience, which means there’s no official record to consult, and his public statements, while extreme, have been vague. The saber-rattling statements that excite his supporters also suggest he has disregard for linchpins of the global order like NATO, the Geneva Conventions and the hard-won global nuclear-weapons limits.

Politico Magazine asked foreign policy and counterterrorism experts, historians, Trump biographers, even psychologists to take a serious guess at how he’d handle the days after a terrorist attack in the United States—all based on what they know about Trump the candidate and what he’ll be facing if he gets elected.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-terrorist-attack-foreign-policy-213784

 

I can say with confidence that Trump would be a "Yuge" improvement over the Jarrett/Skippy administration. Oblunder could honestly be called "Wrong Way Jones"...as he uniformly does the worst thing possible. By contrast, "the Donald" would get things right about the same as a blind squirrel finding an acorn or a broken clock being right twice a day.

 

 

I couldn't say the "with confidence". I could only hope and pray, but I wouldn't have confidence. The devil you know and the devil you don't know could be equal.

 

 

Sweet @Geee! I do know the devil I know, you know? No way, the devil I don't know, is as bad as the devil I know. I know, no one can know the devil you don't know until you know, you know? Just say know.

 

 

No, I don't know - doncha ya knowwink.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump Vodka Is A Perfect Blend Of His Disasters

 

Republicans’ decision to not initially kick the meltdown-mogul to the dumpster has become beyond an embarrassment, with Donald Trump behaving like a fraternity pledge hopped up on watermelon schnapps at a posh country club during a membership luncheon.

 

In February, he praised Planned Parenthood for what may be the first time in GOP debate history, following that up this week by possibly the worst response to an abortion question ever. On March 3 he plumbed depths fathoms beyond, making direct references to his genitalia in the year’s most-watched primary debate. The irony is a man who insists that his personal brand is all about quality and value has permanently befouled the image of his political party.

 

It turns out that none of this comes as a surprise. Trump has long typified the individual who can obtain wealth but never achieves classiness. In Don’s world, nothing is so gorgeous that it cannot be improved by being dipped in gold. There may be no greater assault on the human senses than the opulent crassness of the trappings found on a casino floor, but by all evidence this is the very aesthetic Trump employs within his personal dwellings.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://thefederalist.com/2016/04/01/trump-vodka-is-a-perfect-blend-of-his-disasters/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Julie Custer holds a B.A. in History and has written for the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Blaze, and American Thinker. Contact Julie at her website: www.southernwrites.com.

 

Obviously she is part of the (cue the theme from jaws) Washington Establishment, who hate and fear The Donald because he is such a fabulous and powerful leader who will put them in their place!

 

All Power To The Leader!

 

 

some sarcasm may be present.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

TheRightScoop via iOTWReports

 

Daniel Henninger wrote a devastating editorial in last Thursday's WSJ about what the Republican Party has done to itself in the last 4 years. It left me with little hope for the future.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone photoshopped Donald Trump without his tan - and it's terrifying

 

Someone has decided to give us all nightmares by Photoshopping Donald Trump sans tan.

 

If this is really what he looks like when he isn't bronzed, it is unsurprising he appears to be such a fan of the sun bed.

 

Jen Lewis, who works for BuzzFeed, loaded up Photoshop and painstakingly removed the Presidential candidate's golden glow.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/06/someone-photoshopped-donald-trump-without-his-tan---and-its-terr/

 

OMG This almost makes Killary look good!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump Is So Awful He LOSES A Demo By 12 Points That Mitt WON By 7 In 2012

 

When does this nightmare end? Donald Trump has become such a cancer that he’s actually managed to turn a solid Republican demographic into one that will overwhelmingly favor Hillary Clinton if he is the nominee.

 

The women vote is always talked about. For the most part, women favor Democrats. When digging deeper, the numbers sort out differently showing single women strongly go for Democrats while married women tend to vote Republican. In almost any general Presidential election, Republicans could rely on married women voters to support the Republican nominee.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2016/04/12/trump-is-so-awful/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brock: Enough opposition research to ‘knock Trump Tower down’

 

David Brock, in a Monday night speech to some of the biggest liberal donors in the country, boasted that his researchers had assembled a trove of opposition research on Donald Trump that Democrats could use to “knock Trump Tower down to the sub-basement.”

 

Speaking at a reception on the sidelines of the annual spring meeting of the Democracy Alliance liberal donor club at Santa Monica’s tony Fairmont Hotel, Brock said that Trump “was not properly vetted by his rivals — or by the press” during the Republican presidential primary.

 

But Brock, who is a leading supporter of Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton, said that his non-profit opposition research outfit American Bridge started researching Trump last July, and has unearthed some damning stuff.Scissors-32x32.png

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/david-brock-donald-trump-221823

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump’s Virtual Lynch Mob

 

Call it a high-tech lynching.

 

In the wake of Donald Trump’s being shut out in Colorado — final delegate count: Ted Cruz, 34; Trump, 0 — his fans have formed virtual mobs, and on Sunday a particularly passionate Twitter user tweeted out the home address and phone number of Steve House, chairman of the Colorado GOP.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/433988/donald-trump-twitter-mob-anti-democratic-dangerous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/04/13/developing.-roger-stone-inspired-threats-violence-delegates-police-investigation/ Roger-Stone-Inspired Threats Of Violence Against Delegates Under Police Investigation

 

As you all know, Donald Trump confidant, liar, and thug, Roger Stone has been inciting Donald Trump fans to violence. He has not only called for riots at the Cleveland GOP convention, he has threatened to direct mobs to the hotel rooms of delegates who are underwhelmed by the idea of voting for Donald Trump. This has led to at least one call that his inciting riots and assaults be investigated as a criminal offense.

 

Over the weekend POLITICO reported on how the craptacular, Trump-esque efforts of Donald Trump’s Indiana organization resulted in Trump not having a single delegate who will vote for Trump on the second ballot. Several delegates made it very clear they were #NeverTrump.Scissors-32x32.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

Brock: Enough opposition research to ‘knock Trump Tower down’

 

David Brock, in a Monday night speech to some of the biggest liberal donors in the country, boasted that his researchers had assembled a trove of opposition research on Donald Trump that Democrats could use to “knock Trump Tower down to the sub-basement.”

 

Speaking at a reception on the sidelines of the annual spring meeting of the Democracy Alliance liberal donor club at Santa Monica’s tony Fairmont Hotel, Brock said that Trump “was not properly vetted by his rivals — or by the press” during the Republican presidential primary.

 

But Brock, who is a leading supporter of Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton, said that his non-profit opposition research outfit American Bridge started researching Trump last July, and has unearthed some damning stuff.Scissors-32x32.png

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/david-brock-donald-trump-221823

 

Puh-leeeze! Not vetted? Selective memory much? Uhh...Oblunder.

 

1.) Clown, in clown car, lambasting clowns in another clown car.

 

2.)Exercises from Alinsky's Rules for Radicals:

* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

******************************************************************

I'm not saying Trump hasn't used some of the same...just that there comes a time when the MO of socialist progressive terrorists becomes sickenly trite, obvious & obnoxious. Killary has these useful idiots beginning her general campaign before the end of the primary. Just as she locked up the Super delegates last year.

 

This is combat to the death...and we're swinging pool noodles & nerf bats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/04/13/developing.-roger-stone-inspired-threats-violence-delegates-police-investigation/ Roger-Stone-Inspired Threats Of Violence Against Delegates Under Police Investigation

 

As you all know, Donald Trump confidant, liar, and thug, Roger Stone has been inciting Donald Trump fans to violence. He has not only called for riots at the Cleveland GOP convention, he has threatened to direct mobs to the hotel rooms of delegates who are underwhelmed by the idea of voting for Donald Trump. This has led to at least one call that his inciting riots and assaults be investigated as a criminal offense.

 

Over the weekend POLITICO reported on how the craptacular, Trump-esque efforts of Donald Trump’s Indiana organization resulted in Trump not having a single delegate who will vote for Trump on the second ballot. Several delegates made it very clear they were #NeverTrump.Scissors-32x32.png

 

While getting our teeth knocked down our throats by the spurred boots & titanium toe-taps of the Progressive machine...we should throw a bloody smile & say, "Thank you! May I have another?"

 

We abhor the tactics of the Socialist Progressives & insist that any Republican candidate use logic & compromise. Trump is used to a "knock-down, punch your face in" rumble in the gutter. We don't like that kind of behavior!

 

Look, I'm a Colorado citizen. I don't expect anything different out of Trump. I'm not comfortable with his tactics, but they provide a contrast to my preferred candidate, Ted Cruz. Rule of law. Kick your teeth in by using legal code & solid preparation. That is contrast. Cruz read the rules, sent in a great grassroots team & cut Trump off at the knees. Trump is pulling a minority of Republicans. If he can't win with bluster...he screams foul. It's a fight in the gutter...and it's the Left's tactics back at them. I admire only his willingness to fight; not his methods. I'll still pull the lever for Trump, though, over Killary. At this point in history, so much more is at stake than having a "perfect" candidate. I'm willing to hold my nose & see Trump as President...and hopefully have him do more for our economy, borders and military by accident...than see Killary gut what is left of our Constitutional Republic with malice & evil intent.

 

As a semi-literate citizen of the Centennial state...Trump is not the answer...he is just a tool. No one that I know takes his bluster about his loss of delegates (due to his own campaign's laziness or ineptitude) with any grain of salt. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Draggingtree
4/13/2016

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 10:16 pm

 

Jeff Goldstein is not pleased with Trump supporters:

 

If you are a Trump supporter you learned nothing from this site, nothing from me, nothing from conservatism, nothing from Classical Liberalism, nothing from constitutionalism, nothing from the entrenched establishment dominance over our vote and our lives, nothing about federalism, nothing about a party system, and nothing about morality, ethics, or consistency.

 

Donald Trump backed John Kerry for President. He told us Hillary Clinton would make a wonderful SoS. He believes his bravery barebacking coeds is analogous to spending time in the Hanoi Hilton. His policy positions, if you can ever pin them down, are incoherent, shallow, and often times completely at odds with one another. He’s a conspiracy theorist whose progressive attitudes are running interference for a leftist movement to nationalize state party behavior and create the conditions for a rejection of the electoral college and state autonomy. Scissors-32x32.png

http://patterico.com/2016/04/13/jeff-goldstein-on-trump-supporters/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SrWoodchuck

 

4/13/2016

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 10:16 pm

 

Jeff Goldstein is not pleased with Trump supporters:

 

If you are a Trump supporter you learned nothing from this site, nothing from me, nothing from conservatism, nothing from Classical Liberalism, nothing from constitutionalism, nothing from the entrenched establishment dominance over our vote and our lives, nothing about federalism, nothing about a party system, and nothing about morality, ethics, or consistency.

 

Donald Trump backed John Kerry for President. He told us Hillary Clinton would make a wonderful SoS. He believes his bravery barebacking coeds is analogous to spending time in the Hanoi Hilton. His policy positions, if you can ever pin them down, are incoherent, shallow, and often times completely at odds with one another. He’s a conspiracy theorist whose progressive attitudes are running interference for a leftist movement to nationalize state party behavior and create the conditions for a rejection of the electoral college and state autonomy. Scissors-32x32.png

http://patterico.com/2016/04/13/jeff-goldstein-on-trump-supporters/

 

 

 

Yet, there's something appealing about the guy. Something...je ne sais quoi...in a bombastic, tyrannical way...

 

He just wants to be loved...is that so wrong?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1711615474
×
×
  • Create New...