Jump to content

CBO: Repealing Obamacare would boost economic growth


Valin

Recommended Posts

Unions, insurers team up to fight coming Obamacare tax

 

A coalition of labor unions and health insurance companies is pushing Congress to repeal Obamacare's "Cadillac tax," arguing that it will hurt workers by causing their employers to cut back, or eliminate, insurance coverage.

 

But many economists and analysts argue that whatever the workers lose in coverage they will largely make up in additional wages or benefits.

 

"The economic evidence is strong that there is a tradeoff between health benefits and wages, so I would expect wages on average to rise as firms cut back on health benefits as a result of the Cadillac plan tax. The wage effect could vary by employee and employer, though, depending on labor market conditions. Workers whose skills are in greater demand will be more likely to get wage increases," said Larry Levitt, senior vice president for special initiatives at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

 

The Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, includes a 40 percent tax on employer-provided plans with supposedly lavish benefits, i.e., "Cadillac" plans. The White House's intention was to use the tax revenue from the wealthier plans — estimated by the Congressional Budget Office at $87 billion over 10 years — to finance other parts of the law. However, many of the plans were negotiated by labor unions and are a key benefit for members. They fear the tax will cause employers to drop or scale back the plans rather than pay the tax.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/unions-insurers-team-up-to-fight-coming-obamacare-tax/article/2570833

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another ObamaCare Co-Op Bites The Dust, As Taxpayer Costs Mount

 

On Wednesday, the Nevada Health Co-Op announced that it will go out of business at the end of the year. This is the third out of the 23 ObamaCare-created nonprofit health plans to fail, but it isn't likely to be the last.

After getting $69.5 million in government-sponsored startup loans, Nevada's co-op saw enrollment come in far lower than expected, and claims costs far higher, resulting in a $15 million loss last year.

 

CEO Pam Egan said the co-op was seeing the same dismal results this year, making it impossible to provide "quality care at reasonable rates."

 

Democrats who designed ObamaCare created these nonprofit co-ops in the belief that they could provide price competition in ObamaCare exchanges. To get them off the ground, the federal government pumped more than $2.5 billion in startup loans and $355 million in solvency loans when things started to turn sour last year.

 

The costly experiment has largely been a failure.Scissors-32x32.png

http://news.investors.com/blogs-capital-hill/082715-768522-obamacare-co-op-in-nevada-is-the-third-to-fail.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doctors Will Be the Scapegoats in the Coming Obamacare Disaster

 

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark case of King v. Burwell to protect the Affordable Care Act (ACA) from legal precedents, the rule of law, the English language, and common sense, the battle over the role of government in health care has now shifted away from the courts and back to the ballot box.

 

Democrats certainly have their work cut out for them.

 

According to a July survey of likely voters by Rasmussen Reports, 53 percent of respondents say they have an “unfavorable” view of President Barack Obama’s signature health care law, with 37 percent indicating a “very unfavorable” position. Forty-two percent say they have a “favorable” view, but only a measly 20 percent of the 1,000 surveyed say they have a “very favorable” opinion of ACA.

 

The public’s lukewarm opinion of the law isn’t a surprise to those who have studied ACA’s effect on the health care marketplace since its implementation. Despite promises of greater access and affordability, Obamacare has done nothing but increase costs and limit health care freedom.

 

According to an analysis by HealthPocket, Inc., average premiums for men and women age 23–63 increased substantially from 2013 to 2014, with young, healthy millennials being hit the hardest. Men age 23 saw premiums rise by 78.2 percent, and women age 23 were socked with increases topping 45 percent, compared to pre-Obamacare rates. Data released in 2015 indicate premium increases for millennials continued into 2015, and there are no signs cost increases will slow in the near future.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://humanevents.com/2015/08/31/doctors-will-be-the-scapegoats-in-the-coming-obamacare-disaster/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judges predict foes will win on birth control mandate

By Lyle Denniston on Sep 3, 2015 at 8:50 pm

Five federal judges, breaking ranks with a rising number of their colleagues on the federal courts of appeals, predicted on Thursday that the federal health care law’s birth-control mandate ultimately will fall, when tested in the Supreme Court by non-profit religious groups.

 

The five are members of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit — one of six federal courts at that level which have upheld the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that contraceptive services must be made available for free, despite religious protests by non-profit colleges, hospitals, and charities. This unanimity led the Obama administration to urge the Supreme Court this month to pass up a series of appeals that have been reaching the Justices this summer.

 

Yesterday’s conflicting development came as the Tenth Circuit split seven to five in refusing to rehear en banc several challenges filed by non-profit groups — including one of the best-known cases, filed by a group of Denver-based nuns, the Little Sisters of the Poor. Scissors-32x32.png

http://www.scotusblog.com/2015/09/judges-predict-foes-will-win-on-birth-control-mandate/#more-231785

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NHS to Expensive Cancer Patients: Die Sooner!
Wesley J. Smith

September 4, 2015

 

This is what a death panel looks like.

 

The NHS will not pay for expensive cancer drugs to extend life–effective for six months or so–as it pays for IVF for women up to age 42 and sophisticated artificial insemination for lesbians.

 

From The Guardian story:

 

 

(Snip)

 

Oregon already rations healthcare in this manner under Medicaid, but never rations assisted suicide. What could be cheaper?

 

Obamacare patriarchs such as Ezekiel Emanuel also support healthcare rationing based on quality of life. So look for this same thing to go national here someday, unless the current trajectory is changed.

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

PolitiFact's Lie of the Year: 'Death panels'

Angie Drobnic Holan

Friday, December 18th, 2009

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI

Straight Talk: Advocacy for a New Era in Science
Save the Date: 2015 National health Research Forum September 10 at the Newseum in Washington, DC

 

For sponsorship opportunities, contact Carol Kennedy, ckennedy@researchamerica.org(link sends e-mail) (link sends e-mail).

 

Research!America’s National Forum provides an ideal setting for top leaders in government, industry, patient advocacy, academia and the media to discuss key medical and health research issues as they bear on U.S. medical innovation and the public health. Moderated by high profile journalists, the Forum is the only event of its kind that convenes the directors of relevant federal agencies and other leaders within the research ecosystem in a setting where a distinguished audience may hear from, ask questions of and interact with those who are helping advance public health and shape the future of medical progress.

 

The 2015 National Health Research Forum will start with a reserved seating luncheon where sponsors are seated with agency heads, panelists and Research!America Board Members. During lunch will be panel discussions, each followed by a Q&A session.

 

The audience is comprised of top leadership and senior staff in the areas of research, policy, government affairs and communications at academic medical centers, research institutions, government agencies, congressional offices, voluntary/patient advocacy groups, associations and think tanks—including many Research!America’s distinguished board of directors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obamacare enrollment plunges

Paul Mirengoff

September 9, 2015

 

The Washington Post reports that nearly 1 in 4 of the people who picked a health care plan for 2015 through Obamacare marketplaces have dropped or lost their coverage. As of the end of June, 9.9 million people were paying for health care plans they obtained through the federal or state-run insurance exchanges created by the Obamacare legislation. That’s a decline from the 12.7 million who signed up for a 2015 plan.

 

What explains the drop? The obvious explanation, and the main one cited by the Post, is that a huge number of those who signed up either failed to pay their premiums or paid them for a while but then stopped.

 

Some may have stopped because they (or their spouse) got a job that provided health insurance or they became eligible for Medicaid. But it seems likely that the vast majority stopped paying (or never paid) because they didn’t want to pay. Sharp increases in some premiums likely contributed to this desire.

 

Here’s another factor that contributed to the decline. In more than 400,000 cases, federal health officials cut off coverage to people because they did not provide proof that their citizenship or naturalization status made them eligible for Obamacare.

 

(Snip)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

House Republicans Can Proceed With Obamacare Lawsuit

Adam Freedman September 10, 2015 4 COMMENTS

 

Yesterday, a federal court ruledthat the House of Representatives could pursue its claim against the Obama administration for spending billions of dollars on Obamacare that had never been appropriated by Congress. US District Judge Rosemary Collyer — a George W. Bush appointee — rejected the arguments that the House lacks“ standing” to sue and that the lawsuit was too political to be heard in the courts.

 

“Despite its potential political ramifications, this suit remains a plain dispute over a constitutional command, of which the Judiciary has long been the ultimate interpreter,” the judge wrote in her ruling. The constitutional command is unambiguous: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law …” (Article I, § 9, cl. 7). Scissors-32x32.png https://ricochet.com/house-republicans-can-proceed-obamacare-lawsuit/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

More Here

 

Judge: Congress can sue over Obamacare

Amy Miller

Sunday, September 13, 2015

 

This past week proved contentious for Republicans in Congress. Allies returned to the dark side, Democrats sided with a mortal enemy, and a split in the caucus over how to best handle the disastrous Iran nuclear deal boiled over into a very public battle.

 

Amid the power struggle, the Republicans in the House came out ahead—at least as far as Obamacare is concerned. On Wednesday, a federal judge ruled that House Republicans have standing to sue the Obama Administration over the Administration’s handling of the Obamacare rollout. The House sued Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell and Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew of both spending unappropriated money to implement the new policies, and effectively amending the employer mandate without the approval of Congress.

 

The court ruled that the House has standing to pursue its claims relating to appropriations, but not those related to Lew’s implementation of the statute. More via Reuters:

 

(Snip)

 

 

(Snip)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obamacare enrollees must double to make budget projections work

 

President Obama will need to more than double the number of Americans enrolled in Obamacare exchange plans to reach 21 million next year, the target set in budget projections, in what is shaping up as the next major test for the health care law.

As of June, the Department of Health and Human Services counted 9.9 million customers who have bought plans through the federal HealthCare.gov portal and a handful of state-run exchanges.

 

That puts the administration ahead of it’s own estimates for 2015, but is less than half what the Congressional Budget Office projected for 2016, showing just how much work officials have ahead of them as the next round of enrollment begins in less than two months.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/13/obamacare-enrollees-must-double-to-make-budget-pro/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obamacare enrollees must double to make budget projections work

 

 

 

Related

 

Obamacare Premiums Could Rise by 23 Percent Next Year

Nine of 13 cities in the analysis are predicted to see increased premium rates in 2016

Joe Schoffstall

September 15, 2015

 

Premium rates within Obamacare are set to increase in several states next year, with rates in one city predicted to increase by as much as 22.8 percent, according to a recent study.

 

The study, released by the Kaiser Family Foundation, consists of an analysis of premium rates for the second-lowest-cost silver plan. This plan is used by 68 percent of people currently enrolled in the federal health insurance marketplace.

 

The study looked at the most readily available data of premium filings from insurers to state insurance departments and includes major cities in 12 states and Washington, D.C. Comprehensive data was not fully available for numerous other states, excluding them from the analysis.

 

According to the data, nine of the 13 cities included within the study will see an increase in their 2016 premium rates.

 

(Snip)

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deductibles Rising, Rising, Rising

Sept. 23 2015

 

Even as the White House continues to focus on the raw number of insured Americans in the lead-up to the next ACA sign-up period, the evidence continues to mount that the fundamental dynamics of U.S. health care are still hitting Americans where it hurts: the pocketbook. A new study show that costs are rising across the system, not especially dramatically, but consistently, making care more unaffordable year by year. The New York Times reports on new research by the Kaiser Family Foundation that finds deductibles rising faster than wages:

 

The rise in deductibles is accompanied by what experts say is a relatively modest increase in premium costs across the country (though an increase, nonetheless). But as the chief executive of Kaiser notes, low premium growth doesn’t mean individuals are seeing relief. “This slowdown is invisible to average people. They’re paying more and more,” he said.

 

(Snip)

 

But health care reform needs to do more than subsidize spending (the ACA approach) or restrain spending (the high deductible approach); it needs to focus on making individual procedures cost less. The cheaper the underlying services are, the better off the whole system will be, with eventual knock-on effects on premiums and deductibles—and that can’t just be fixed by controlling spending from the consumer side. Only by reforming the way health care services are delivered—experimenting with things like telehealth, remote monitoring, and new providers and care settings, like nurse practitioners and clinics, respectively—can we ultimately make our way to a sustainable health care system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is ObamaCare debate starting to thaw?

 

In a nearly empty House chamber on Monday afternoon, a little-noticed bill came up for a voice vote. The few lawmakers on the floor shouted “aye,” no one shouted “no,” and the bill was passed.

 

Changing ObamaCare has rarely been so drama-free.

 

Passage of the bill, which would adjust the healthcare law’s definition of a small employer, is raising hopes that more bipartisan tweaks to ObamaCare could be on the way.

“I do believe that this hopefully is the beginning of a lot of little fixes to a big, big law that’s not perfect,” said Rep. Tony Cárdenas (Calif.), a lead Democratic sponsor of the bill.

Democrats have long accused Republicans of being unwilling to make even minor fixes to the healthcare reform law, arguing the party’s fixation on repeal was standing in the way.

But after a Supreme Court decision over the summer that kept ObamaCare intact for a second time, legislative tweaks are getting a second look.

The bill from Cárdenas and Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), called the Protecting Affordable Coverage for Employees (PACE) Act, deals with an obscure provision in ObamaCare that changed the definition of a small employer from one with 50 employees or fewer to one with 100 employees or fewer, beginning in 2016.Scissors-32x32.png

 

http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/255570-is-obamacare-debate-starting-to-thaw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obamacare rates could jump 50 percent in Minn.
Robert King

10/2/15

 

Obamacare rates for certain Minnesotans will jump nearly 50 percent in 2016, dealing a blow to supporters of the healthcare law who have said premium increases would be nominal. Minnesota's regulators announced that the average rate increase for Obamacare enrollees would range from 14 to 49 percent in 2016.

 

The state's Department of Commerce said it still expects its insurance rates to be amongst the "lowest in the country and federal tax credits will help reduce monthly premiums." It said 2015 rates were the lowest in the nation. For the state's small group market, which is for small business with up to 100 full-time employees, the rates will fluctuate from a 12 percent decrease to a 5.6 percent increase.

 

Minnesota officials said about 5.5 percent of residents in the state get individual policies, mainly through Obamacare, and 5.4 percent get coverage in the small group market. But the potential 49 percent increase will surely play a part in a larger debate over the insurance rates for Obamacare enrollees.

 

(Snip)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Draggingtree
There Are Three Ways To Repeal Obamacare . . .

By Curt No Comments

Thu, Oct, 8th, 201

5 37 views

 

Kevin D. Williamson:

 

. . . and two of them aren’t happening.

 

For my sins, I just finished listening to probably my 800thtalk-radio debate about repealing the so-called Affordable Care Act. The exchange has taken on the comforting familiarity of ritual: The host and a conservative guest shouted that this is a matter of betrayal and cowardice, and the beleaguered party guy quietly insisted that it’s a matter of arithmetic, that Republicans don’t have the votes to get it done.

 

An expression that has gained some odd currency on the Right of late is: “Make him veto that bill!” (Yes, the exclamation point is mandatory.) The idea here being that forcing Barack Obama to veto a bill that he is inclined to veto constitutes some sort of moral victory. “Hurray for us! We forced the president to . . . defeat us. Again.”

 

This is not a president who is particularly veto-happy: http://www.floppingaces.net/most-wanted/there-are-three-ways-to-repeal-obamacare/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lAnother non-profit Obamacare insurer bites the dust

 

Obamacare continues to unravel all on its own as the Kentucky Health Cooperative, a non-profit co-op, will close its doors because the payment from the "risk corridors" mandated by Obamacare isn't enough to cover its massive losses.

The Hill:

That program was intended to protect insurers from heavy losses in the early years of the health law by taking money from better-performing insurers and giving it to worse-performing ones.

However, the Obama administration announced on Oct. 1 that the program would pay out far less than requested, because the payments coming in were not enough to match what insurers requested to be paid. Therefore, insurers only will receive 12.6 percent of the $2.87 billion they requested.

“It is with sadness that we announce this decision," the insurer’s CEO, Glenn Jennings, said in a statement. "This very difficult choice was made after much deliberation. If there were a way to avoid it and simultaneously do right by the members, providers and all others that we serve, we would do so.”Scissors-32x32.pnghttp://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/10/another_nonprofit_obamacare_insurer_bites_the_dust.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody Checked on Obamacare Lately?
Jim Geraghty
October 19, 2015

Obamacare, That Big Issue Barely Mentioned in the Debates…

 

Hey, remember Healthcare.gov? You know, the $2 billion web site that didn’t work at first and now works “for the most part”?

 

The construction of healthcare.gov involved 60 companies, supervised by employees of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services instead of a lead contractor, according to the inspector general at the Health and Human Services Department. The project was marked by infighting among the contractors, CMS officials and top officials at HHS, the Cabinet-level department that oversees CMS, according to e-mails released Sept. 17 by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Or maybe it costs $2.5 billion by now. It’s hard for the federal government to keep track of the money it spends, apparently:

 

The Medicare agency and independent auditors have had trouble tracking the costs of Affordable Care Act programs. The Government Accountability Office, a congressional agency, said in a Sept. 22 report that it was “difficult and time consuming” to obtain financial information for the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, the CMS office that manages many ACA programs, and that it “could not determine the reliability of most of the amounts” CMS provided.

A mere three years after the launch, the web site is now including the ability to search for a doctor and what plans they accept.

 

President Obama keeps going around the country, insisting everything’s working fine; the numbers indicate the administration and the Democratic Congress had no idea how difficult this would be when they passed the law:

The effort to ease the consumer experience is driven by the administration’s push to reach the 10.5 million people who Sylvia Mathews Burwell, the secretary of Health and Human Services, says are still uninsured but eligible for marketplace coverage. While 9.9 million people have received health insurance through the exchanges as of June 30, the law has far to go to reach the 21 million people the Congressional Budget Office estimated in March would be enrolled next year. Federal health officials say that target is too optimistic, but they have yet to announce their own numerical goal.

(Snip)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Art of Managing Obamacare Expectations
Reihan Salam
October 20, 2015

On October 15th, Sylvia Burwell, President Obama’s Secretary of Heath and Human Services, set 10 million exchange enrollees as her goal for 2016. She explained that though hitting this target would be difficult, she and her team were committed “to working smarter to reach it.” I love teamwork as much as the next person, but there’s something more than a little odd about this goal of 10 million. As Brian Blase of the Mercatus Center explains, as recently as four months ago, the Congressional Budget Office projected that there would be 20 million exchange enrollees in the coming year. And this estimate of 20 million was revised downward from an earlier 2012 estimate of 23 million for 2016. One of the experts Blase cites, Charles Gaba, projects that the exchanges will have 12.2 million enrollees by the end of 2016, and one assumes that Burwell is lowballing: it is far better to set 10 million as your goal and hit 12.2 million than to acknowledge that the Obama administration is now shooting for roughly half the exchange enrollees the CBO projected back in June of this year.

 

What exactly is going on? Essentially, Obamacare exchange plans are a good deal for the sick and the relatively poor and a very bad deal for the healthy and the better-off. We should protect the interests of the sick and the poor. But a far better approach would be to provide a safety net for those too sick and too poor to find affordable coverage while leaving others to buy the insurance plans that best meet their needs, a subject I’ll write about at greater length here at NRO. The trouble with Obamacare is that, for now, at least, it takes the opposite approach: it requires everyone to buy tightly-regulated, expensive plans, yet its premium subsidies aren’t generous enough to make these plans affordable for households earning more than, say, 250 percent of the federal poverty level. The only way to get middle-income people to buy private insurance plans that don’t serve their economic interests is to coerce them. So far, the Obama administration has been reluctant to jack up penalties to such an extent that the middle-class uninsured have no choice but to sign up for exchange coverage, presumably because they fear the political consequences. One way or another, Obamacare is not going to survive in its current form.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Republicans pave path to Obamacare repeal

By PAIGE WINFIELD CUNNINGHAM (@PW_CUNNINGHAM) 10/22/15 12:01 AM

Republicans won't succeed in their most strategic move yet to repeal Obamacare, but they're laying out a roadmap for killing the healthcare law if they win the White House next year.

 

The House is poised to pass a bill Friday that uses special rules known as "budget reconciliation" to get rid of some of the healthcare law's biggest provisions, including its individual and employer mandates to buy coverage, its taxes on high-cost health plans and medical device manufacturers, and an independent board charged with cutting Medicare costs.

 

The rules will allow Senate Republicans to pass the repeal measure this year or next with just 51 votes instead of 60,

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obamacare-bill-a-roadmap-to-repeal/article/2574645

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@nickydog @SrWoodchuck BOHICA

Under single-payer, Coloradans will have another failed health-care experiment
Kristina Ribali
October 26, 2015

Like many other states, Colorado’s Obamacare exchange has been plagued with problems since the get-go. Unrealistic expectations of the costs of government run health care, improper planning, and the absence of oversight over executives in charge of implementing the program has meant that Connect for Health Colorado is facing tough financial times.

 

But undeterred, Colorado lawmakers, appear to be ready to double down on their government run health care experiment and by doing so, will likely make the state’s financial problems even worse. How could it get worse you ask? By implementing a single-payer plan.

 

Through what is dubbed, “Initiative 20,” the state would dissolve Connect for Health Colorado and replace it with a single-payer system. As the Denver Post asks, “Would you trust an elected state board to govern your medical needs more than private insurers and Obamacare?” This in a state where the Obamacare co-op just canceled 80,000 plans. Thanks for asking Denver Post, but no, I wouldn’t.

 

But lawmakers like state Senator Irene Aguilar, a Democrat from Denver, thinks that even with all its failures Obamacare hasn’t gone far enough. She said, “The Affordable Care Act has made insurance available to more people, but we haven’t made a dent in the under-insured people who struggle to afford the deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses.”

 

(Snip)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@nickydog @SrWoodchuck BOHICA

 

Under single-payer, Coloradans will have another failed health-care experiment

Kristina Ribali

October 26, 2015

 

Like many other states, Colorado’s Obamacare exchange has been plagued with problems since the get-go. Unrealistic expectations of the costs of government run health care, improper planning, and the absence of oversight over executives in charge of implementing the program has meant that Connect for Health Colorado is facing tough financial times.

 

But undeterred, Colorado lawmakers, appear to be ready to double down on their government run health care experiment and by doing so, will likely make the state’s financial problems even worse. How could it get worse you ask? By implementing a single-payer plan.

 

Through what is dubbed, “Initiative 20,” the state would dissolve Connect for Health Colorado and replace it with a single-payer system. As the Denver Post asks, “Would you trust an elected state board to govern your medical needs more than private insurers and Obamacare?” This in a state where the Obamacare co-op just canceled 80,000 plans. Thanks for asking Denver Post, but no, I wouldn’t.

 

But lawmakers like state Senator Irene Aguilar, a Democrat from Denver, thinks that even with all its failures Obamacare hasn’t gone far enough. She said, “The Affordable Care Act has made insurance available to more people, but we haven’t made a dent in the under-insured people who struggle to afford the deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses.”

 

(Snip)

 

@Valin!

 

With John Lickenpooper ( aka "Mini-Soros") at the helm in the Capitol....and a Prog majority, still in the House & Senate....I don't expect anything good for the State of Colorado. We're lucky to have Kaiser-Permanente through Sweet Eileen's union job, but after her store chain was sold to another, her union is attempting to hard-nose negotiations & it may result in....no job & no insurance. If that happens....it'll be "bye-bye" for a while & maybe a change in domicile. Gulp!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1711697040
×
×
  • Create New...