New York Times Editorial Board Endorses Hillary Clinton: The Issues Don’t Matter!

[WestVirginiaRebel]

Breitbart:

The New York Times editorial board endorsed Hillary Clinton for president Saturday. That is not surprising. But the way the board did it is.

 

“In any normal election year, we’d compare the two presidential candidates side by side on the issues. But this is not a normal election year,” the Times admitted in its first sentence. It continued:

 

A comparison like that would be an empty exercise in a race where one candidate — our choice, Hillary Clinton — has a record of service and a raft of pragmatic ideas, and the other, Donald Trump, discloses nothing concrete about himself or his plans while promising the moon and offering the stars on layaway. (We will explain in a subsequent editorial why we believe Mr. Trump to be the worst nominee put forward by a major party in modern American history.)

 

 

So Clinton is being propped up by the so-called newspaper of record, and that newspaper is openly conceding that the issues have nothing to do with it. Predictably, it is all about Trump. But the Times, in defiance of the standards of coherent literature, also shoots down the very premise that it established in its opening sentence, claiming, “Running down the other guy won’t suffice to make that argument. The best case for Hillary Clinton cannot be, and is not, that she isn’t Donald Trump. The best case is, instead, about the challenges this country faces, and Mrs. Clinton’s capacity to rise to them.”

________

 

Desperately looking for diversions away from their candidate's own problems.

[Valin]

 

But this is not a normal election year,

 

Massive Understatement!!

[Draggingtree]

 

 

But this is not a normal election year,

 

Massive Understatement!!

 

 

You Think

[Valin]

 

 

 

But this is not a normal election year,

 

Massive Understatement!!

 

 

You Think

 

 

 

On Occasion I Do. Not To Often....or deeply.