Geee Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Washington Times: A review of the worst American fratricide in the long Afghanistan war also shows that the military’s official investigation faults a Green Beret commander, an Air Force air controller and the four-man crew on the B-1B bomber that conducted the errant strike. But the investigation, headed by an Air Force general, does not question the use of a strategic bomber for close air support, even though experts say the tragedy illustrates why the big plane is misplaced in that role. The Washington Times has reviewed the investigation and interviewed knowledgeable sources to compile a picture of the doomed operation in southern Afghanistan’s Zabul province, as well as the political and military missteps that precipitated it. Key among them, according to defense experts, was the use of the strategic bomber. bird of prey: In inquiries following the friendly fire deaths of five American servicemen and one Afghan battalion commander, officials have questioned the efficacy of the B-1B bomber and its crews to carry out precision strikes. (u.s. air force) bird of prey: In inquiries following the friendly fire deaths of five ... more > The B-1B’s sheer size required it to fly a wide orbit of five miles for optimum bombing as it made right turns over the nighttime battle site. This put it outside the range of night vision goggles. The goggles were the only equipment the bomber had to identify the infrared strobe lights worn by U.S. troops to distinguish them from the enemy and to keep them safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Some had warned this might happen. Several lawmakers, including Senate Armed Services Committee members Kelly Ayotte and John McCain, have criticized the Air Force for its decision last year to retire all A-10 Warthogs, the only aircraft devoted to close air support and a weapon loved by the infantry. Mr. McCain became incensed when he learned one of the A-10 replacements was the B-1B, saying the wide-winged aircraft was totally unsuited for close air support’s requirement to sort out friendlies from the enemy in crowded combat. Since Day 1 the AF Brass has hated the A-10 and tried to kill every chance they get. Several reasons why this is true 1. It doesn't fly high 2. It doesn't fly fast 3. It supports the Army & Marines (the real enemy). Given the A-10 is 40 years old, are there plans to build a replacement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now