Jump to content

Judge Strikes Down Costly Provision Of Dodd-Frank


Geee

Recommended Posts

041714-697615-court-nixes-dodd-frank-congo-conflict-minerals-mandate.htm?fromcampaign=1Investors Business Daily:

Regulation: In a victory for common sense, a federal judge has voided a race-based mandate of the Dodd-Frank Act that would have cost manufacturers and retailers billions in compliance expenses.

 

Marking the first time a court has ruled that a provision of Dodd-Frank violates the Constitution, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the financial "reform" law's bizarre rule requiring companies to disclose whether their products contain "conflict minerals" from Africa violates the First Amendment.

 

As we've argued, the rule had zero to do with financial reform and was sneaked into the law by Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters to protect the Congo.

 

The little-noticed Dodd-Frank provision, tucked away under "Misc. Provisions," requires manufacturers to prove the metals they use in products aren't mined by rebels in the Congo and nearby countries.

 

Makers of cellphones, computers and consumer electronics, for example, must trace the origin of minerals back through their supply chains, then report to the SEC or face punishment.Scissors-32x32.png


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1713607145
×
×
  • Create New...