Jump to content

Coffee Shop


Rheo

Recommended Posts

SrWoodchuck

Sonnie Johnson! Remember her name......she's a force to be reckoned with:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T39Csty6fkc&feature=player_embedded

 

H/T:DougRoss@Journal

 

So what is the most important thing to remember about Sonnie Johnson?

A. She's a Tea Party Racist

or

B. She hates women and wants to keep them oppressed,

or

C. she's a (cue the theme from Jaws) Sarah Palin supporter?

Gee, @Valin......that's overthinking it a bit......she's a strong, conservative woman, who doesn't need or want Obama bucks, victim status under the protective wing of the Congressional Black Caucus, the New Black Pampers Panthers, absolution by black bigots, Jesse & Al........and it looks like her current picture instead of her 9th grade altar girl photo, like Trayvon Martin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@SrWoodchuck

 

thinking.gif over thinking....hey that means I was actually thinking! That's something that you see every day. Hooray For Me! thumbsup.gif

 

Don't worry, I promise not to let it go to my head.biggrin.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obamacare Oral Argument – Day 1

William A. Jacobson

March 26, 2012

 

 

(Snip)

Via ScotusBlog, it does not appear that the Justices will buy into the administrations arguments, and will rule on the merits (caveat — oral argument questions and comments are not always a reliable indicator):

 

When Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., commented at the end of Monday’s first day of hearings on the health care law, “We’ll continue argument on this case tomorrow,” it seemed to have a secondary meaning even if he did not intend it. The comments and questions of the Justices during the 89-minute exchange left the distinct impression that they are prepared to rule on the constitutionality of the mandate that individuals must buy health insurance, and not push the issue off into the future. The exact route they would take was a bit uncertain, but their skepticism about taking a pass was clear.

 

That did not mean, of course, that they would uphold the mandate. That is tomorow’s question. But an argument that at times seemed almost to bog down in the complexity of the tax code pointed toward a refusal to bar the lawsuits that had challenged the mndate and put it before the Court this week.

(Snip)

 

transcript here. The audio is here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

clearvision

Interesting that the last article claims the "administrations arguments" against today. The administration is also against ruling it a tax. The SC had to bring in a 3rd party to argue the side that nothing can be done until the "tax" is paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Multiple suspensions paint complicated portrait of Trayvon Martin

 

Say it isn't true about little Trayvon.

 

Scissors-32x32.pngInstead the officer reported he found women’s jewelry and a screwdriver that he described as a “burglary tool,” according to a Miami-Dade Schools Police report obtained by The Miami Herald. Word of the incident came as the family’s lawyer acknowledged that the boy was suspended in February for getting caught with an empty bag with traces of marijuana, which he called “irrelevant” and an attempt to demonize a victim.

 

Trayvon’s backpack contained 12 pieces of jewelry, in addition to a watch and a large flathead screwdriver, according to the report, which described silver wedding bands and earrings with diamonds.Scissors-32x32.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1711691231
×
×
  • Create New...