I gotta get caught up on these tapes and their whole background.
I do love the above graphic... and compare it to the MSM's frenzy to investigate every detail and document of GWB's military records.
Jump to content
Suggested Video: Obama Protesting at Harvard in 1990
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:15 PM
Ricochet: The Latest Breitbart Video: A Stupid Fight to Pick?
Just before he died, Andrew Breitbart intimated that he had some really damning videos he was going to release which would be a big problem for Obama. He promised it would be part of a proper vetting of the president, which wasn't done in 2008.
To me this doesn't seem to have much more evidence to support it than does the birther kookiness. Frankly, I think that without a smoking gun, these guilt by association arguments that much of the right has obsessed over since 2008 are just straight losers for conservatives. All they do is generate conspiratorial arguments that are difficult to prove and which feed the meme that we're all a bunch of racists.
I know a lot of people think this video and the connection the Breitbart crew are trying to make between Obama and Bell's crazy ideas prove that Obama is in fact the racist. But it just doesn't play that way to normal people. And without hard, explicit evidence of Obama directly espousing racist rhetoric and ideas, this comes off as nothing but a feeble and ugly reach.
Are we more interested in theatrics and over-the-top accusations, or are we interested in reassuring normal people that we're also normal and not the reactionary witch-hunters we are so often caricatured as?
After having watched these video, I have to say...Yes?...And?
Posted 08 March 2012 - 05:42 PM
Or......as Breitbart liked to say............"So?"
Seems to me that just in his Department of In-Justice, there is enough Black Panther, Black Farmer payout,
Posted 08 March 2012 - 05:49 PM
My problem is that there is not more of a record of The "o" engaging in these types of activities. This is the kind of thing that "community organizers" do for a living. I have tried everything (short of going to Chicago) to find some news stories of the past behavior of this man. None seem to exist. They have to be in some archive, somewhere.
I can't help but wonder what the liberal media thinks will happen to a free press if the agenda that The "o" and his associates are putting into play is allowed to come to fruition.
Posted 08 March 2012 - 06:01 PM
What is already happening........crony journalism! The print media is almost history....and liberal talk radio? They'll both be getting "equal" time & bailouts from the next Oblunder admin.
Posted 08 March 2012 - 11:16 PM
Life on your knees......for some.....is better than the alternative. They become "apparatchik's." [a full-time, professional functionary of the Communist Party or government;]
Posted 09 March 2012 - 05:36 AM
The MSM certainly wouldn't spend any time on a story if someone found an 1990s video of Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich embracing David Duke... or attended church for years at the Westboro Baptist Church. We'd hear CNN's Soledad O'Brian say, "Nothing to see here... keep moving folks".
Posted 09 March 2012 - 05:39 AM
Save yourself the money for air fare or gas to Chicago. The o was anointed years ago and the defensive cover is still tightly sealed.
Rezko, Blago - you name 'em - nada!!. Makes me utterly sick. Crook County is almost 100% DemoRat controlled from press to public officials to the law to Big Unions to the citizenry. Liberalism is a religion there.
Posted 09 March 2012 - 08:35 PM
I made that exact point at CGR. I was answered that I was comparing Bell with Duke.
Posted 10 March 2012 - 05:31 AM
CNN's Soledad O'Brien, Liberal Guest Team Up to Attack Breitbart Editor Over 'Critical Race Theory'
By Matt Hadro | March 08, 2012 | 17:01
Change font size: A | A
When Breitbart.com's Joel Pollak went on CNN and connected then-law student Barack Obama to radical Harvard professor Derrick Bell, CNN guest Jay Thomas of Sirius radio began creepily asking Pollak if he was afraid of violence from black people, on Thursday morning's Starting Point.
During the chippy segment, host Soledad O'Brien fiercely defended Bell and insisted that Obama's previous support of him was a non-story. She accused Pollak of "misreading" Bell's critical race theory, even though the professor has clearly espoused radical views in his past, including writing a fictional account of how blacks would be sold to aliens as slaves. O'Brien also failed to disclose that she herself is an admitted admirer of Bell's. [Video below the break. Audio here.]
Read more: http://newsbusters.o...b#ixzz1oiF5Rj4n
Posted 11 March 2012 - 02:02 PM
Power Line: Barack Obama to Khalid Muhammad: Two Degrees of Separation
John Podhoretz and Patterico highlight a close connection between Barack Obama and Khalid Muhammad. Obama, as we know, was a disciple of Derrick Bell; in the video that Breitbart.com released a few days ago, he urged his listeners to open their hearts and minds to Bell’s teachings. So, what were Bell’s teachings?
Bell was a fervent admirer of Louis Farrakhan and Khalid Muhammad of the Nation of Islam. Podhoretz quotes a 1994 interview in which Bell said, “We should really appreciate the Louis Farrakhans and the Khalid Muhammads while we’ve got them.” Our readers are well aware of the repellent Farrakhan, but who was Khalid Muhammad? Patterico gives us Muhammad’s “Kill the Cracker” speech, in which Muhammad, whom Derrick Bell so admired, advocated genocide:
Muhammad gave his “kill them all” speech in 1993, and was famous for it in the circles in which Derrick Bell moved when Bell said, in 1994, that “we should really appreciate” Khalid Muhammad. (UPDATE: This YouTube video is from a reprise, circa 1996, of Muhammad's 1993 speech; you can see the 1993 speech, where Muhammad first said, "We kill the women. We kill the children. We kill the babies. We kill the blind. We kill the crippled. We kill the [imitates a crazy person]. We kill ‘em all. We kill the faggots. We kill the lesbians. We kill them all.” at the Patterico link.)
Posted 11 March 2012 - 04:38 PM
As well you should Valin... The only difference is one is embraced by liberal academia and elitist LIBs and the other didn't have the academic credentials and cult following.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Welcome to TRR
The Right Reasons currently has over 1500 unique visitors a day.
The site has no advertising and is supported by donations of our members and guests.
If you use the site frequently, and can afford to, please consider a small donation to help defray our hosting costs.
Donations can be made by credit card or PayPal by clicking the DONATE button above.
All donations are used strictly for hosting and software costs.