AceRimmer Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 US News & World Report:When Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour told us this week that the 2012 GOP presidential field will be "wide open," we had no idea just how many Republicans might be marching to Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada for the opening caucuses and primaries. Including Barbour, who will decide after the fall midterm elections but who is expected to run in 2012, Washington political insiders tell us that nine Republicans are almost a lock to run and another eight are considering a presidential bid.Many former presidential campaign organizers say that now is the time to be considering a bid because by spring of next year, the list of announced candidates will be firm and those in will be divvying up staff and raising money. I think some of this is wishful thinking on a liberal reporter's single braincell. For one, I don't think Bobby Jindal wants to run next year, but is keeping the powder dry for '16 or '20. I also don't see Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, Jeb Bush(the LSM has really done everything they can to ruin the Bush name, and it'll take another few years before the smear campaign is not forgotten but discovered for what it was for Jeb to make a go at it) or John Thune running in '12. I think Haley Barbour should have run against King Bubba in '96, but he may seen as too old now(personally, he'd be my choice, but I don't know how much backing he'd get outside of the Deep South). We already know that Romney is going to run, and I think it's safe to assume that Newt, Pawlenty, and more than likely Huckabee and maybe Palin will dive in. The rest of this clown's field is a bankshot.BTW: if she runs, Sarah gets my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AnneV Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 I mostly like the "Top Nine." Huckabee and Palin are the two I'd be least likely to vote for in a primary, they're too far right for my liking, but if either one was our candidate I would get behind them and support them 100% -- something a lot on the hard right should have done for John McCain in 2008, then maybe, just maybe we wouldn't have Obummer in the white house now!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 AnneV, and I like your avatar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollyannaish Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 Well, if this is the list (which I doubt it will be) I would say this about my primary support Yes- Mitt Romney Maybe-Sarah Palin Yes-Haley Barbour Yes-Mitch Daniels No-Mike Huckabee Heck No-Newt Gingrich (And please put a sock in it between here and there. ) Yes- John Thune Heck Yes-Chris Christie Yes-Tim Pawlenty The Eight Long Shots Yes- Mike Pence Yes-Jim DeMint No-Ron Paul Maybe-Nikki Haley Maybe-Jeb Bush Maybe- Rick Santorum Maybe- John Bolton Yes-Bobby Jindal Wish that Paul Ryan was on this list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 Well, if this is the list (which I doubt it will be) I would say this about my primary support Yes- Mitt Romney Maybe-Sarah Palin Yes-Haley Barbour Yes-Mitch Daniels No-Mike Huckabee Heck No-Newt Gingrich (And please put a sock in it between here and there. ) Yes- John Thune Heck Yes-Chris Christie Yes-Tim Pawlenty The Eight Long Shots Yes- Mike Pence Yes-Jim DeMint No-Ron Paul Maybe-Nikki Haley Maybe-Jeb Bush Maybe- Rick Santorum Maybe- John Bolton Yes-Bobby Jindal Wish that Paul Ryan was on this list. Yes- Mitt Romney Maybe YES -Sarah Palin Yes-Haley Barbour Yes-Mitch Daniels No-HECK NO Mike Huckabee Heck No-Newt Gingrich (And please put a sock in it between here and there. ) Yes- John Thune Heck Yes-MAKE THAT HE** YES Chris Christie Yes-Tim Pawlenty The Eight Long Shots Yes- Mike Pence Yes-Jim DeMint No-Ron Paul Maybe-Nikki Haley Maybe NO WAY NO HOW -Jeb Bush Maybe- Rick Santorum Maybe YES - John Bolton Yes-Bobby Jindal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollyannaish Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 I think we can do business Pepper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casino67 Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 YesNo- Mitt Romney Maybe YES -Sarah Palin YesNo-Haley Barbour Yes-Mitch Daniels No-HECK NO Mike Huckabee Heck No-Newt Gingrich (And please put a sock in it between here and there. ) Yes- John Thune Heck Yes No-MAKE THAT HE** YES Chris Christie--won't run. Yes-Tim Pawlenty The Eight Long Shots Yes- Mike Pence Yes-Jim DeMint No-Ron Paul MaybeNo-Nikki Haley Maybe NO WAY NO HOW -Jeb Bush MaybeNo- Rick Santorum Maybe No - John Bolton YesNo-Bobby Jindal We have some consensus. My last five 'no' votes are because Haley is too raw, maybe a run in a few years. Jeb doesn't want it. Rick because he wears his religion on his sleeve, sort of like Carter. Bolton because he can't win, but would make a great VP. Jindal IMO just couldn't win, period. Of the remainder, Palin, Thune, Pawlenty would be the top contenders. Pence and DeMint could run, but would probably be thought of as 'Who?'. Just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollyannaish Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 Good list. My maybes are built on not knowing enough about them...or wanting to see if the conditions on the ground support their candidacy. I do have concerns about Mitt and Healthcare, (and I'm still bugged by the fact he never has his shirt untucked... Heh.) but other than that, I'm ok with him. I am seeing a serious contender here: Chris Christie so far has all of our hearts and minds. In my opinion, he is the only truly exciting politician on that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casino67 Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 Good list. My maybes are built on not knowing enough about them...or wanting to see if the conditions on the ground support their candidacy. I do have concerns about Mitt and Healthcare, (and I'm still bugged by the fact he never has his shirt untucked... Heh.) but other than that, I'm ok with him. I am seeing a serious contender here: Chris Christie so far has all of our hearts and minds. In my opinion, he is the only truly exciting politician on that list. But Christie has said repeatedly that he is not interested. Pick again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollyannaish Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 Good list. My maybes are built on not knowing enough about them...or wanting to see if the conditions on the ground support their candidacy. I do have concerns about Mitt and Healthcare, (and I'm still bugged by the fact he never has his shirt untucked... Heh.) but other than that, I'm ok with him. I am seeing a serious contender here: Chris Christie so far has all of our hearts and minds. In my opinion, he is the only truly exciting politician on that list. But Christie has said repeatedly that he is not interested. Pick again. Yeah, well...as much as I love the guy, he's still a politician and they've been known to be encouraged to change their minds. Heh. I am glad we don't have to decide today. In general, I find that list kind of depressing. It might be less depressing if we could just get Newt and Huck off of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casino67 Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 If Huck were to run, he would drop out after the first or second primary. Could Newt even be able to raise enough money to make a run? I don't think he has a constituency to look to for support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AceRimmer Posted September 13, 2010 Author Share Posted September 13, 2010 If Huck were to run, he would drop out after the first or second primary. Could Newt even be able to raise enough money to make a run? I don't think he has a constituency to look to for support. I'll never forgive Huck for tag-teaming with McCain to knock off Romney in the '08 primaries. As for Newt, he's better as a rightwing strategist than candidate. The LSM really did a smear campaign on him in the '90s, and he managed to step in it more than once on his own while Speaker. That being said, both will probably run, and flame out quickly, because I doubt either can keep up with Romney, Palin, or Pawlenty in the polls and the fundraising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49OUVRKQinw Mississippi governor Haley Barbour shares his plan for 2012. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 If Huck were to run, he would drop out after the first or second primary. Could Newt even be able to raise enough money to make a run? I don't think he has a constituency to look to for support. I'll never forgive Huck for tag-teaming with McCain to knock off Romney in the '08 primaries. As for Newt, he's better as a rightwing strategist than candidate. The LSM really did a smear campaign on him in the '90s, and he managed to step in it more than once on his own while Speaker. That being said, both will probably run, and flame out quickly, because I doubt either can keep up with Romney, Palin, or Pawlenty in the polls and the fundraising. Agree. Scripture tells us we are to forgive, so I forgive the Huckster...but I don't forget! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestVirginiaRebel Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 The Main Eventers: Yes-Mitt Romney (say what you will, he looks the part of a presidential candidate, and knows economics, Romneycare aside. Could have crossover appeal in the general election) Maybe-Sarah Palin (if she can get beyond Tea Party support) Maybe-Mike Huckabee Yes-Mitch Daniels Yes-Tim Pawlenty No-Haley Barbour (would look too much like the "Old South" wing of the GOP; too old) No-Newt Gingrich (good on past ideas, lousy on treating the idea of running like a vanity exercise) No-Chris Christie (too soon) Long Shots (aka VP candidates): No-Ron Paul No-Nikki Haley (certainly could be a main eventer by 2016) Yes-Mike Pence No-John Bolton (sounds more like a protest candidate than a serious contender) Maybe-Rick Santorum Maybe-Jim DeMint Yes-John Thune No-Jeb Bush (too soon for another Bush in the WH) No-Bobby Jindal (waiting for 2016) Speaking of 2016, if The One wins, these are my top choices (just for fun): Yes-Bobby Jindal Yes-Jeb Bush Yes-Marco Rubio Yes-Nikki Haley Maybe-Scott Brown Maybe-Chris Christie Yes-Paul Ryan Maybe-David Petraeus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Maybe-Jim DeMint Maybe? I would point out he has written a book out. Saving Freedom: We Can Stop America's Slide into Socialism Ok in came out last year, but it has become a prerequisite to running. While I like him...A lot! I think I'd prefer a governor. How ever it is they had better be ready to rumble....to quote Howie Long "Bring your big boy pads". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valin Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 2016Yes-Paul Ryan Only if he runs away from Daddy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argyle58 Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Good list. My maybes are built on not knowing enough about them...or wanting to see if the conditions on the ground support their candidacy. I do have concerns about Mitt and Healthcare, (and I'm still bugged by the fact he never has his shirt untucked... Heh.) but other than that, I'm ok with him. I am seeing a serious contender here: Chris Christie so far has all of our hearts and minds. In my opinion, he is the only truly exciting politician on that list. But Christie has said repeatedly that he is not interested. Pick again. Yeah, well...as much as I love the guy, he's still a politician and they've been known to be encouraged to change their minds. Heh. I am glad we don't have to decide today. In general, I find that list kind of depressing. It might be less depressing if we could just get Newt and Huck off of it. Chris Christie has a questionable past, both as a lobbyist, and as U.S. Attorney for the State of New Jersey. While these things aren't a hindrance in New Jersey political circles, they are sure to complicate any national campaign he might engage in. I love the guy and what he has accomplished as Governor, but I don't think that he is a viable presidential candidate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 2016Yes-Paul Ryan Only if he runs away from Daddy! I thought his dad died when he was 16. What do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickydog Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 I'm glad you asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollyannaish Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 2016Yes-Paul Ryan Only if he runs away from Daddy! Did you mean Rand Paul? Rheo Nickydog this may be the source of the confusion. Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Paul Ryan. Sort of like me with Chris Christie and Charlie Christ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickydog Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Yup, that must be the explanation. I have to think twice about Chris Christie and Charlie Christ, too. Thanks, pollyannaish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikeytx86 Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 US News & World Report: When Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour told us this week that the 2012 GOP presidential field will be "wide open," we had no idea just how many Republicans might be marching to Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada for the opening caucuses and primaries. Including Barbour, who will decide after the fall midterm elections but who is expected to run in 2012, Washington political insiders tell us that nine Republicans are almost a lock to run and another eight are considering a presidential bid. Many former presidential campaign organizers say that now is the time to be considering a bid because by spring of next year, the list of announced candidates will be firm and those in will be divvying up staff and raising money. I think some of this is wishful thinking on a liberal reporter's single braincell. For one, I don't think Bobby Jindal wants to run next year, but is keeping the powder dry for '16 or '20. I also don't see Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, Jeb Bush(the LSM has really done everything they can to ruin the Bush name, and it'll take another few years before the smear campaign is not forgotten but discovered for what it was for Jeb to make a go at it) or John Thune running in '12. I think Haley Barbour should have run against King Bubba in '96, but he may seen as too old now(personally, he'd be my choice, but I don't know how much backing he'd get outside of the Deep South). We already know that Romney is going to run, and I think it's safe to assume that Newt, Pawlenty, and more than likely Huckabee and maybe Palin will dive in. The rest of this clown's field is a bankshot. BTW: if she runs, Sarah gets my vote. I think 17 is about right, I think there are about 17 people who are at least considering it and getting advice on if it is a good idea or not, maybe take a pit stop to a key state like Iowa to see what kind of buzz they get, but I do not think think there are 17 Republicans seriously considering running. I think the actual field will probably be more like 8-12 candidates, with about 4-5 or even 6 top tier candidates, which is quite a sizable field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikeytx86 Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Good list. My maybes are built on not knowing enough about them...or wanting to see if the conditions on the ground support their candidacy. I do have concerns about Mitt and Healthcare, (and I'm still bugged by the fact he never has his shirt untucked... Heh.) but other than that, I'm ok with him. I am seeing a serious contender here: Chris Christie so far has all of our hearts and minds. In my opinion, he is the only truly exciting politician on that list. But Christie has said repeatedly that he is not interested. Pick again. Yeah, well...as much as I love the guy, he's still a politician and they've been known to be encouraged to change their minds. Heh. I am glad we don't have to decide today. In general, I find that list kind of depressing. It might be less depressing if we could just get Newt and Huck off of it. Chris Christie has a questionable past, both as a lobbyist, and as U.S. Attorney for the State of New Jersey. While these things aren't a hindrance in New Jersey political circles, they are sure to complicate any national campaign he might engage in. I love the guy and what he has accomplished as Governor, but I don't think that he is a viable presidential candidate. Compared to a Gingrich or a Huckabee his baggage is pretty minimal. But I think he won't consider running till 16'/20' anyway. He's still got a lot of work to bring NJ back from the abyss, though he has done an almost miraculous job thus far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikeytx86 Posted September 14, 2010 Share Posted September 14, 2010 Definite Yes: Chris Christie Mitt Romney John Huntsman Probable Yes: Mitch Daniels Maybe: Bobby Jindal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now